Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
><font color=blue><center><b><p> >Codes, Programs, and Information 1 ></font></center></b> >In our experience, codes are produced only by >intelligence, not by natural processes or chance. <i>A >code is a set of rules for converting information from >one useful form to another. </i> Examples include >Morse code and Braille. Code makers must >simultaneously understand at least two ways of >representing information and then establish the rules >for converting from one to the other and back again. > >The genetic material that controls the physical >processes of life is coded information. Also coded are >complex and completely different functions: the >transmission, translation, correction, and duplication >systems, without which the genetic material would be >useless, and life would cease (a). It seems most >reasonable that the genetic code and the accompanying >transmission, translation, correction, and duplication >systems were produced simultaneously in each living >organism by an extremely high intelligence (b). > >a. <font color=blue><i> “Genomes</font></i> [all the >DNA of a species] <font color=blue><i>are remarkable >in that they encode most of the functions necessary >for their interpretation and propagation.” </font></i> >Anne-Claude Gavin et al., “Proteome Survey Reveals >Modularity of the Yeast Cell Machinery,” <i>Nature, ></i>Vol. 440, 30 March 2006, p. 631. > >b. The genetic code is remarkably insensitive to >translation errors. If the code were produced by >random processes, as evolutionists believe, life would >have needed about a million different starts before a >code could have been stumbled on that was as resilient >as the code used by all life today. [See Stephen J. >Freeland and Laurence D. Hurst, “Evolution Encoded,” ><i>Scientific American, </i> Vol. 290, April 2004, pp. >84–91.] > ><font color=blue><i> “This analysis gives us a reason >to believe that the A–T and G–C choice forms the best >pairs that are the most different from each other, so >that their ubiquitous use in living things represents >an efficient and successful choice rather than an >accident of evolution.” </font></i> Larry Liebovitch, >as quoted by David Bradley, “The Genome Chose Its >Alphabet with Care,” <i> Science, </i>Vol. 297, 13 >September 2002, p. 1790. > ><a rel=nofollow target=_blank >href="http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSci >ences18.html#wp1050369">http://www.creationscience.com/ >onlinebook/LifeSciences18.html#wp1050369</a>

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.