VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:29:08 04/18/07 Wed
Author: No name
Subject: I can't believe the measures a mother would go to to get the judges attention in portfolio but I think this is a little too far http://www.voy.com/69166/32327.html


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> I've seen this picture before and while its a take off of the old coppertone commericals I think its tacky. Judges how would you judge this photo??? -- No name, 13:36:10 04/19/07 Thu [1]


[ Edit | View ]


[> I would give it a 0 for age appropriateness that's for sure! -- No name, 20:56:01 04/19/07 Thu [1]


[ Edit | View ]


[> Last I checked, there wasn't a category to score for "age appropriateness". For originality and personality I would score it quite high. For overall appearance, that would depend on the rest of the portfolio pics. -- Judge's opinion., 17:40:37 04/21/07 Sat [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Well I have judged photogenic for several different pageants and photo contests and age appropriateness has often been one of the facets of scoring. For example, 0-10 for clarity & quality, 0-10 overal apperance, 0-10 facial beauty, 0-10 age appropriate. -- No name, 16:28:43 04/24/07 Tue [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> I have never had age appropriatness be part of the scoring. However if it was and you felt it wasn't age appropriate I would expect you to mark down on that. I myself don't see anything wrong with it. -- Judge's opinion., 12:47:14 04/25/07 Wed [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Also, how can you even judge age appropriateness in photogenic(not port) with everyone making their babies look like grown women. NONE of the glitz pics are age appropriate. -- Judge's opinion., 12:49:30 04/25/07 Wed [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> I have seen it be a judging criteria for a natural pageant -- No name, 16:37:59 04/26/07 Thu [1]


[ Edit | View ]


[> Actually it scores high. It won at Fabulous Faces. -- No name, 18:54:01 04/21/07 Sat [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> No surprise there, look who the owner of the pageant is!! -- No name, 08:43:57 04/27/07 Fri [1]


[ Edit | View ]




[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.