Anyway, the child is only a part of her. Remember, the birds and the bees? The father and the mother are part of the child, through genetic material, and the child is physically connected to the mother. It gestates for approximately nine months inside the mother, at which point the mother gives birth? Do you remember any of that?
So, anyone with a basic knowledge of biology knows that the child is only part of the mother. Perhaps you meant psychology?
----And Just because the woman is biologically connected to the physical being of that baby for 9 months does not mean that the child is ONLY a part of "her". I think anyone with a basic knowledge of biology would know that.----
Date Posted:14:23:29 04/02/01 Mon
What are you talking about?
I was making the point that, Yes, the child is biologicaly a part of BOTH the mother and father so that YES both should be equally responsible for it, not just the mother because of her 9 month physical attachment.
Date Posted:06:16:15 04/03/01 Tue
----I was making the point that, Yes, the child is biologicaly a part of BOTH the mother and father so that YES both should be equally responsible for it, not just the mother because of her 9 month physical attachment.
Is that more clear?----
No, that is not more clear. It is exactly what you said before, and it is dead wrong.
You say:
----the child is biologicaly a part of BOTH the mother and father----
This is false. The truth is, the mother and the father are biologically part of the child. The opposite of what you said.
Then you write:
----And Just because the woman is biologicaly connected to the physical being of that baby for 9 months does not mean that the child is ONLY a part of "her".
Again, see how I had written "DOES NOT MEAN...." did you miss that or something?----
You contradict yourself in this sentence. Do you even realize that? You write the contradiction the second time in all caps even:
----"DOES NOT MEAN...."----
Then ask me:
----did you miss that or something?----
I think I should ask you the same thing. Did you miss that or something?
Date Posted:14:29:38 04/02/01 Mon
" And Just because the woman is biologicaly connected to the physical being of that baby for 9 months does not mean that the child is ONLY a part of "her". "
Again, see how I had written "DOES NOT MEAN...." did you miss that or something?