Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

Subject: Mitt had his chance and couldn't get it done Author: Considering him is an indication of how bad the field is [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: Thu December 03, 2015 12:20:19 In reply to: Romney would immediately be "in the thick of it" 's message, "Unlikely? Very ..... Impossible? Not really. Because of the sad state of the Republican party ......" on Thu December 03, 2015 11:39:46 [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Maybe but it's not out of the question. Consider this. "You won't have Nixon to kick around anymore." Thu December 03, 2015 17:22:26 Actually, there's some good candidates in the running (NT) -- There's just too many of them to stand out, Thu December 03, 2015 17:32:25 Also, consider this: at the 2012 debate, Obama arrogantly waved off and dismissed Romney's concerns for the future. -- "The 1980s called, they want their policy back.", Thu December 03, 2015 20:07:40