Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
|
| Subject: I do not feel that age should be the primary factor or that you should have to be 26 before you can compete in the married system. There are 30,40 and 50 year olds out there that have been married for only a few years. I think it depends on the person and their life experiences. Age is a number, one that we all get caught up in way too often. I have an idea, lets take the age and Birthday off the application. Then no one knows how old you are and you can be seen for the married woman that you are.I find it hurtful when people say that I can not represent married womenI b/c I am not 30 | |
Author: or b/c I don't have children. Neither my age nor number of children make me less of a woman or less of a married woman. Yes, I already represented my state at Mrs America, so obviously my state judges thought I possesed the qualities of representing married women, not just a certain age. | [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] Date Posted: 18:17:17 07/16/10 Fri In reply to: Mrs. 's message, "To all the directors out there and to those who've been around this system for a while (meaning more than 5 years), what does this system look for in it's winners? Taking a look at the states themselves there's a wide range of winners from young (24) to older (44) that's a 20 year age span. Click in for a bit more." on 05:34:40 07/14/10 Wed >I'd like to know what this system is really about. If >this is a system that focuses on raw beauty and >nothing else, well then I in my early 30's, don't look >like I did when I was 24. I hold a PhD. level >education, mother of 2, and active in my community. >Too me, that's what I would like to see in a Mrs. >America. A woman that's well, a woman. You can't >tell me that a 20 something possess the same life >experiences as a more mature person regardless of >children. That's what I simply don't get. When I >competed in the USA system, it was about beauty yes, >but also about being able to promote my state and >bring in more girls to the system. I don't see much >of that in America, but then again I'm new to this. >So what I'd really like to see is a reasonable >dialogoue about what this system REALLY WANTS from >it's winner. No reason wasting my time if it's just >raw beauty and a 20 something body. > >Thank you and PLAY NICE with your comments!!!! [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| [> Subject: I was married at 18 so I could have competed a long time ago but I guess more than age I feel the years married should matter more than the age. Bash away but is this about being a Mrs. Who happens to be accomplished and beautiful or someone who is beautiful and just happens to be married? | |
|
Author: length vs age [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 19:12:42 07/16/10 Fri >I'd like to know what this system is really about. If >this is a system that focuses on raw beauty and >nothing else, well then I in my early 30's, don't look >like I did when I was 24. I hold a PhD. level >education, mother of 2, and active in my community. >Too me, that's what I would like to see in a Mrs. >America. A woman that's well, a woman. You can't >tell me that a 20 something possess the same life >experiences as a more mature person regardless of >children. That's what I simply don't get. When I >competed in the USA system, it was about beauty yes, >but also about being able to promote my state and >bring in more girls to the system. I don't see much >of that in America, but then again I'm new to this. >So what I'd really like to see is a reasonable >dialogoue about what this system REALLY WANTS from >it's winner. No reason wasting my time if it's just >raw beauty and a 20 something body. > >Thank you and PLAY NICE with your comments!!!! [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> [> Subject: Wow! Another great comment! There are so many ways to look at this issue. Maybe it should be length married (at least 5 years??), regardless of age. | |
|
Author: just a thought [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 20:39:46 07/16/10 Fri >>I'd like to know what this system is really about. If >>this is a system that focuses on raw beauty and >>nothing else, well then I in my early 30's, don't look >>like I did when I was 24. I hold a PhD. level >>education, mother of 2, and active in my community. >>Too me, that's what I would like to see in a Mrs. >>America. A woman that's well, a woman. You can't >>tell me that a 20 something possess the same life >>experiences as a more mature person regardless of >>children. That's what I simply don't get. When I >>competed in the USA system, it was about beauty yes, >>but also about being able to promote my state and >>bring in more girls to the system. I don't see much >>of that in America, but then again I'm new to this. >>So what I'd really like to see is a reasonable >>dialogoue about what this system REALLY WANTS from >>it's winner. No reason wasting my time if it's just >>raw beauty and a 20 something body. >> >>Thank you and PLAY NICE with your comments!!!! [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> [> [> Subject: 5 years total or 5 years to the same man?? lol | |
|
Author: just had to ask.. but like your idea [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 08:35:05 07/17/10 Sat >>>I'd like to know what this system is really about. >If >>>this is a system that focuses on raw beauty and >>>nothing else, well then I in my early 30's, don't >look >>>like I did when I was 24. I hold a PhD. level >>>education, mother of 2, and active in my community. >>>Too me, that's what I would like to see in a Mrs. >>>America. A woman that's well, a woman. You can't >>>tell me that a 20 something possess the same life >>>experiences as a more mature person regardless of >>>children. That's what I simply don't get. When I >>>competed in the USA system, it was about beauty yes, >>>but also about being able to promote my state and >>>bring in more girls to the system. I don't see much >>>of that in America, but then again I'm new to this. >>>So what I'd really like to see is a reasonable >>>dialogoue about what this system REALLY WANTS from >>>it's winner. No reason wasting my time if it's just >>>raw beauty and a 20 something body. >>> >>>Thank you and PLAY NICE with your comments!!!! [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> [> [> [> Subject: Funny! I just set myself up for that one, didn't I?! lol | |
|
Author: I'm gonna say 5 years to the same man....but I'm sure someone will have something to say about that, too! [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 13:54:30 07/17/10 Sat >>>>I'd like to know what this system is really about. >>If >>>>this is a system that focuses on raw beauty and >>>>nothing else, well then I in my early 30's, don't >>look >>>>like I did when I was 24. I hold a PhD. level >>>>education, mother of 2, and active in my community. >>>>Too me, that's what I would like to see in a Mrs. >>>>America. A woman that's well, a woman. You can't >>>>tell me that a 20 something possess the same life >>>>experiences as a more mature person regardless of >>>>children. That's what I simply don't get. When I >>>>competed in the USA system, it was about beauty yes, >>>>but also about being able to promote my state and >>>>bring in more girls to the system. I don't see much >>>>of that in America, but then again I'm new to this. >>>>So what I'd really like to see is a reasonable >>>>dialogoue about what this system REALLY WANTS from >>>>it's winner. No reason wasting my time if it's just >>>>raw beauty and a 20 something body. >>>> >>>>Thank you and PLAY NICE with your comments!!!! [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |