Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
|
| Subject: I was married at 18 so I could have competed a long time ago but I guess more than age I feel the years married should matter more than the age. Bash away but is this about being a Mrs. Who happens to be accomplished and beautiful or someone who is beautiful and just happens to be married? | |
Author: length vs age | [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] Date Posted: 19:12:42 07/16/10 Fri In reply to: Mrs. 's message, "To all the directors out there and to those who've been around this system for a while (meaning more than 5 years), what does this system look for in it's winners? Taking a look at the states themselves there's a wide range of winners from young (24) to older (44) that's a 20 year age span. Click in for a bit more." on 05:34:40 07/14/10 Wed >I'd like to know what this system is really about. If >this is a system that focuses on raw beauty and >nothing else, well then I in my early 30's, don't look >like I did when I was 24. I hold a PhD. level >education, mother of 2, and active in my community. >Too me, that's what I would like to see in a Mrs. >America. A woman that's well, a woman. You can't >tell me that a 20 something possess the same life >experiences as a more mature person regardless of >children. That's what I simply don't get. When I >competed in the USA system, it was about beauty yes, >but also about being able to promote my state and >bring in more girls to the system. I don't see much >of that in America, but then again I'm new to this. >So what I'd really like to see is a reasonable >dialogoue about what this system REALLY WANTS from >it's winner. No reason wasting my time if it's just >raw beauty and a 20 something body. > >Thank you and PLAY NICE with your comments!!!! [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| [> [> Subject: Wow! Another great comment! There are so many ways to look at this issue. Maybe it should be length married (at least 5 years??), regardless of age. | |
|
Author: just a thought [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 20:39:46 07/16/10 Fri >>I'd like to know what this system is really about. If >>this is a system that focuses on raw beauty and >>nothing else, well then I in my early 30's, don't look >>like I did when I was 24. I hold a PhD. level >>education, mother of 2, and active in my community. >>Too me, that's what I would like to see in a Mrs. >>America. A woman that's well, a woman. You can't >>tell me that a 20 something possess the same life >>experiences as a more mature person regardless of >>children. That's what I simply don't get. When I >>competed in the USA system, it was about beauty yes, >>but also about being able to promote my state and >>bring in more girls to the system. I don't see much >>of that in America, but then again I'm new to this. >>So what I'd really like to see is a reasonable >>dialogoue about what this system REALLY WANTS from >>it's winner. No reason wasting my time if it's just >>raw beauty and a 20 something body. >> >>Thank you and PLAY NICE with your comments!!!! [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> [> [> Subject: 5 years total or 5 years to the same man?? lol | |
|
Author: just had to ask.. but like your idea [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 08:35:05 07/17/10 Sat >>>I'd like to know what this system is really about. >If >>>this is a system that focuses on raw beauty and >>>nothing else, well then I in my early 30's, don't >look >>>like I did when I was 24. I hold a PhD. level >>>education, mother of 2, and active in my community. >>>Too me, that's what I would like to see in a Mrs. >>>America. A woman that's well, a woman. You can't >>>tell me that a 20 something possess the same life >>>experiences as a more mature person regardless of >>>children. That's what I simply don't get. When I >>>competed in the USA system, it was about beauty yes, >>>but also about being able to promote my state and >>>bring in more girls to the system. I don't see much >>>of that in America, but then again I'm new to this. >>>So what I'd really like to see is a reasonable >>>dialogoue about what this system REALLY WANTS from >>>it's winner. No reason wasting my time if it's just >>>raw beauty and a 20 something body. >>> >>>Thank you and PLAY NICE with your comments!!!! [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> [> [> [> Subject: Funny! I just set myself up for that one, didn't I?! lol | |
|
Author: I'm gonna say 5 years to the same man....but I'm sure someone will have something to say about that, too! [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 13:54:30 07/17/10 Sat >>>>I'd like to know what this system is really about. >>If >>>>this is a system that focuses on raw beauty and >>>>nothing else, well then I in my early 30's, don't >>look >>>>like I did when I was 24. I hold a PhD. level >>>>education, mother of 2, and active in my community. >>>>Too me, that's what I would like to see in a Mrs. >>>>America. A woman that's well, a woman. You can't >>>>tell me that a 20 something possess the same life >>>>experiences as a more mature person regardless of >>>>children. That's what I simply don't get. When I >>>>competed in the USA system, it was about beauty yes, >>>>but also about being able to promote my state and >>>>bring in more girls to the system. I don't see much >>>>of that in America, but then again I'm new to this. >>>>So what I'd really like to see is a reasonable >>>>dialogoue about what this system REALLY WANTS from >>>>it's winner. No reason wasting my time if it's just >>>>raw beauty and a 20 something body. >>>> >>>>Thank you and PLAY NICE with your comments!!!! [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |