[ Show ]
[ Shrink ]
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[> Subject: I watched that MU in full in 95. Now I went through parts of it after maybe 10 years when I last looked at some. I think this pageant has not aged as well as 1996. I loved the location, but if you saw Miss Worlds 1992 to 1994 in South Africa, they were more grandiose, more of the location was shown. This feels in a way like the first pageant of the new era, because of Daisy Fuentes, retrospectively it's a start of a decline for MU or maybe it's just that I was never a fan of hers, she doesn't project that wholesomeness. I forgot India's introduction, amazing. Chelsi's performance reads very modern and timeless. This is a pageant that no one can dispute the results of. I think no matter to whom the pageant would belong, the USA would have won. Thanks for sharing that fact about Eleonora. I supported her with all my heart that day and the fact she has succeeded in life made my day! Thank you for your thorough review, if ever you'll have time to do others, I and others will appreciate it.
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 21:37:25 05/14/20 Thu
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Forum timezone: GMT-5|
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.