VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]
Subject: Don't jump the gun. Maureen was in place from 1997 to 2001. She brought forth the new image of women empowerment, logo, and it was under her that all 3 pageants became young and hip. She was out by miss Universe 2001 that failure lies with Paula Shuggart. While I can appreciate Paula her pageants have been horrible, she seems to follow the wind. And it's way past her stay, it's time to retire.


Author:
Original Rican
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 11:45:53 07/19/20 Sun
In reply to: HawtPlusSeksi (nsi) 's message, "LOL. Early 2000s is the lowest point under Maureen Reiddy. There was a major risk MUO pageants would be discontinued. 2001 being the all time low. 2002 at Miss Universe despite a very low number of delegates was the turning back point. Obviously not in terms of amazing ratings, these will not come back, but the renewed interest was then emphasized by the modern approach and then, emergence of social media changed it for better.." on 00:29:11 07/19/20 Sun


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> Subject: Honey, that woman empowerment led to the worst ratings for pageant. I think since MU 2915 MU a similar direction was understaken by IMG and we all know it is a disaster. In comparison 97-00 MU pageants come across as ok. You are right though that the atrocious MU 2001 was already under Shugart, which frankly shocked me.


Author:
HawtPlusSeksi (nsi)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:45:54 07/19/20 Sun


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Ironically I think Miss Universe 1997,98,99,00 were some of the best produced. Similar miss teen USA 96,97,98, 99,00 were great. But in this same period miss usa was horrible. 97 was stale, 98 was a confusing modeling show with par women, 99 was old women across the board, 00 no make up year yet the most party won.


Author:
Original Rican
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:45:31 07/19/20 Sun


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
Message subject (required):

Name (Registered users only):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:


Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.