Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Are the sizes of the very oldest nested bowls [with >rings on the inside bottom] the same as the merely old >nested bowls from the 40s-50s or did the number sizes >shift at a certain point, or decade, in time? I'm >asking because I've started assembling a new set >little by little [to replace one I lost in my >divorce!] and I'd expected that both inner-ring and >no-ring bowls would nest together. Now, based on the >three bowls I've bought so far, I fear that may not >work. The oldest bottom-ring bowls are the priciest >so, naturally, I wish to choose those very carefully >by condition and color sequence. I'd hoped to marry >those over time into a nice no-ring set I'd buy more >quickly through eBay. I bought a 2 with rings and it >fits snugly inside a no-ring marked 4 [which I thought >was a marking mistake] but the no-ring 4 I just bought >does not nest one size up -- it seems more like a 5 or >a 4.5! I'm very confused! Can anyone help with this? >Thank you!

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.