[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]
Subject: You really think people want to hear a ten minute recitation of people they've never hard of?

Talented they may have been, but they weren't names people know.
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: Monday, September 23, 05:58:30am
In reply to: Other actors ommitted from In Memoriam; Nathaniel Taylor (Sanford & Son), Beverley Owen (The Munsters), Ethel Ayler (The Cosby Show), Katherine MacGregor (Little House on the Prairie), among others. 's message, "The public EMMY ceremony SHOULD be honoring thier OWN, those nominated or WON, but shameful omissions included DOZENS of EMMY former nominees, but certainly should have aired the deceased 17 WINNERS (its HONORED dead) ommitted from the broadcast! ~List ..." on Monday, September 23, 12:50:14am

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Subject Author Date
IMO, you can start be removing ppl like Nancy Wilson, Peter Fonda, Gloria Vanderbilt, Rutger Hauer, and Carol Channing, who had near nothing to do with Televison industry. We can agree that the actual Emmy WINNERS should ALWAYS be publicly honored by their own members! (NT)Adding the 17 Emmy winners who were snubbed, would have cost the broadcast about 80 seconds of air time (5 seconds ea)!Monday, September 23, 10:34:30am
If it was done well and gave you an idea of why they were being honored (NT)then yes.Monday, September 23, 11:11:27am

Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.