| Subject: Re: Supremacy or Superiority? |
Author:
jack
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 03:02:24 03/03/15 Tue
In reply to:
Joanie
's message, "Re: Supremacy or Superiority?" on 16:02:51 02/09/14 Sun
These messages make sense to me. Often the woman is in charge and the man accepts it.
>Bim, you stated it perfectly! Though there may be
>difference I sexes, neither is superior over the other
>as each is a compliment to the other, doing that which
>the other cannot and I am not saying that either sex
>can not. Only that some because of their sex will not.
>
>
>
>
>
>>rather that sexes complement each other. I also
>>believe in the importance of roles.
>>
>>The physical differences does not indicate superiority
>>but complementation. Another complementation is that
>>women are better incentives, while men are better
>>initiatives. This may not necessarily be genetic but
>>rather social; i don't know; but most of the
>>differences are nurtured.
>>
>>Most people are neither pure doms nor pure subs. Most
>>people are doms sometimes or in some aspects, and subs
>>otherwise. That is most people are switches, and this
>>is an essential aspect to understand about humans.
>>
>>Most female-led relations that are successful are
>>those where there is separations of roles. He might be
>>sub to her in some things, while maybe dominant in his
>>job. This conforms with the "switch" nature of most
>>people. Most other female-led relations that do not
>>take this into account fail. Even the dominant wives
>>themselves become uninterested and seek cuckolding, or
>>other dominant partners.
>>
>>Being submissive is not something wrong to be ashmed
>>of. This is an essential part of the self freedom.
>>Nobody is a real dom if he/she is not free. He/she
>>must be free to live the submissive side as well as
>>the dominant side. Most dominant women, honestly
>>speaking, fear to admit before men their submissive
>>side. Most also do not have sexual freedom. I have
>>never seen a woman who picks one or two men at a bar
>>for sex.
>>
>>I promote femdom from my belief in indifferences and
>>androgyny (but i need to point at the failures).
>>
>>bim
>>
>>
>>>Personally, I don't see one gender as wholly superior
>>>or inferior to the other.
>>>Each gender has its strengths and weaknesses. Males
>>>are genetically designed to be the more physical
>>>gender. You'd have to go and change our species to
>>>alter this. (yes, there are exceptions, but that's
>>>what they are - exceptions - not the norm).
>>>While males are predisposed to physical labor,
>females
>>>are better suited to decision making roles.
>>>If you just look at female lead marriages, those are
>>>the ones where both partners are happiest, there's
>>>less conflict, and thus, the family as a whole is
>>>better off.
>>>Men who serve their wives or girlfriends are happier
>>>than those that don't have that opportunity.
>>>Unfortunately, most men are too stupid to realize
>this
>>>and are unwilling to accept a female lead. Women can
>>>make their mates happy if they would just take the
>>>lead and steer the relationship in that direction
>>>(either overtly or covertly).
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 