Looking Back... -- Ben's Message Board

Wednesday, December 30, 08:16:05pm [ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

Subject: Looking Back...

Author:
Damoclese
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 02/22/04 9:44pm
In reply to: Wade A. Tisthammer 's message, "!" on 02/20/04 10:43am

Looking back on this thread, I realize I should have never have pursued this topic this far. (with Wade anyway) In fact, this thread makes me feel sorta schizophrenic or psychotic. (or maybe it's just Wade that makes me feel that way) Anyway, I'd like some other impressions on this particular thread. Does anyone (with the exception of Wade) see Wade's proposed numbering scheme as necessary?

To me, it just seems intentionally defined and imposed to bring about a contradiction. It need not be that way as I demonstrated earlier in this thread. (e.g. starting at zero)

Barring any outside input, I've pretty much said all that I feel needs to be said to resolve this particular issue. Any comments or suggestions (except from Wade) are welcome.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

Some clarifications. Wade A. Tisthammer 02/27/04 1:54pm

Answer -- Damoclese, 02/27/04 3:28pm

Infinity began? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 02/27/04 10:45pm

Infinity squared -- Damoclese, 02/28/04 7:19am

oops -- Damoclese, 02/28/04 7:59am
Splitting unnecessary hairs. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/ 5/04 11:59am

Giggle -- Damoclese, 03/ 5/04 3:34pm

My point exactly -- Ben, 03/ 2/04 7:34am

And what point would that be? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/ 5/04 12:03pm

[ VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Looking back on this thread, I realize I should have >never have pursued this topic this far. (with Wade >anyway) In fact, this thread makes me feel sorta >schizophrenic or psychotic. (or maybe it's just Wade >that makes me feel that way) Anyway, I'd like some >other impressions on this particular thread. Does >anyone (with the exception of Wade) see Wade's >proposed numbering scheme as necessary? > >To me, it just seems intentionally defined and imposed >to bring about a contradiction. It need not be that >way as I demonstrated earlier in this thread. (e.g. >starting at zero) > >Barring any outside input, I've pretty much said all >that I feel needs to be said to resolve this >particular issue. Any comments or suggestions (except >from Wade) are welcome.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.