and so it goes and so it goessssss -- Ben's Message Board

Wednesday, December 23, 03:36:35am [ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9 ]

Subject: and so it goes and so it goessssss

Author:
Damoclese
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 02/24/04 11:54am
In reply to: BTL 's message, "The Bible is it from God" on 02/24/04 9:43am

I state words from
>the Bible because I have studied it all of my life,

I'm sorry.

>It is Historicaly Correct and has not been disproven
>yet!

Did you see that movie Titanic? Man, that was a killer film. (get it? killer?) It was historically correct on all points of major significance. Why in 2000 years, the details it was wrong on may not even matter. Nonetheless, I hope people wouldn't be so gullible as to think Jack and Rose actually existed on the Titanic as they were portrayed. Something can be historically accurate (at least in some regards) and not be totally historically true.

Yes, the Bible does cover a lot of history that seems to have happened, but then again, it makes a lot of claims that lack any substantial historical evidence. (e.g. whatever happened to the paper trail in egypt of the exodous? They just didn't notice? Why aren't there actual paintings or statues of Jesus, a man who raised the dead?) I don't buy it.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

Interesting books QUITTNER 02/26/04 2:07pm

[ VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
> I state words from >>the Bible because I have studied it all of my life, > >I'm sorry. > >>It is Historicaly Correct and has not been disproven >>yet! > >Did you see that movie Titanic? Man, that was a killer >film. (get it? killer?) It was historically correct on >all points of major significance. Why in 2000 years, >the details it was wrong on may not even matter. >Nonetheless, I hope people wouldn't be so gullible as >to think Jack and Rose actually existed on the Titanic >as they were portrayed. Something can be historically >accurate (at least in some regards) and not be totally >historically true. > >Yes, the Bible does cover a lot of history that seems >to have happened, but then again, it makes a lot of >claims that lack any substantial historical evidence. >(e.g. whatever happened to the paper trail in egypt of >the exodous? They just didn't notice? Why aren't there >actual paintings or statues of Jesus, a man who raised >the dead?) I don't buy it.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.