Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: lady relax, maybe its the first time the poster saw this not everyone is familiar with the voy board on a daily basis. If a person just saw a post for the first time and responds it doesn't mean it is old news

Author: No name

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 14:23:07 08/19/15 Wed In reply to: 's message, "The only defense I'm making of Jane Ann is that if you expect to come here and inspire outrage against Jane Ann because she was disloyal to Amalia, I think you'll be sorely disappointed. But while we're on the subject of poor judgment, who chose Jane Ann? And what does it say about your judgment to be defending Amalia? You absolutely read it right: I think Jane Ann was incompetent. But again, who hired her? "The boss." I'm simply saying that this is all irrelevant. Jane Ann. Amalia. All of it. I would LOVE to see the voy board move on from this. So, why did you decide to resurrect this two weeks later?" on 13:53:08 08/19/15 Wed [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Nope. It's still old news. And they're obviously very familiar with the situation considering they were spewing Amalia's (not very relaxed) propaganda verbatim. Additionally, I was responding to the OP's snark. Perhaps you should read her posts before telling me to relax, lady. (NT)	No name	14:35:28 08/19/15 Wed
Amalia still has a reason to be on the boards only because she is the one who filed the appeal for ISA as well as filed the lawsuit against Miss America. Jane Ann has no continuing involvement with the organization and is in no way involved in any legal proceedings. She has no relevance to these ongoing issues! (NT) -- No name, 15:57:03 08/19/15 Wed True, but until there are developments in that lawsuit, I'm growing tired of the constant rehashing of what has already happened. It seems like it's all been said. (NT) -- No name, 16:26:49 08/19/15 Wed