[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789[10] ]
Subject: Questions from users

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 19:27:03 11/23/20 Mon

Sorry for the slow response.

But, last week, I received a few emails from users asking the purpose of this forum.

This is mostly a "General Purpose" forum.

But, it also replaces the old "Innocent Nudity" forum.
(Sometimes known as "Innocent Non-Sexual Nudity).

I will admit that sometimes this forum has gone astray.

This is NOT a fetish forum.
We're not looking for deliberately fake stories.
However, innocent truthful stories and evidence are welcomed.

I especially love to see links which provide substantiation.

But, sometimes this forum heads into the wrong direction when people talk about ["bare-ass spankings which lead to erections, in the classroom, during a PTA meeting."]

Those stories are a little far-fetched.
Plus, they violate Voy's terms of service.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[> Subject: Regarding your statements

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 03:59:41 11/24/20 Tue

"I especially love to see links which provide substantiation."

Most links given are to other posts on this very board, which does not substantiate anything.

"Those stories are a little far-fetched.
Plus, they violate Voy's terms of service."

And yet, those posts remain. Not only do they remain, they're met with positivity. The majority of your posters support the actions that occur in those stories. Maybe you're a pedophile, maybe you're not. I suspect that perhaps you are a pedophile, since you have no issue with this board being full of pedophiles relishing in stories of child sexual abuse. The actions spoken of in many of these stories would land those people who committed those actions in jail. Many of the stories here, if they are true, would be testimony of a crime. In some cases, they're confessions.

[> Subject: to Factchecker

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 05:44:03 11/24/20 Tue

Factchecker, you are on dangerous legal ground calling me a pedophile or even saying that you suspect I am one.

If you continue with your rants, I will have no hesitation in passing on your details to the Voy Admin as well as the police. And to my lawyer who will hound you until you are broke.

Get the message? if you do not like what is written here, just walk away.
[> [> Subject: Re: to Factchecker

Willy to admin
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:14:18 11/24/20 Tue

Admin for fucksakes why haven't you removed this lunatic from this board already.I don't understand why you are so stupidly slow to act as you were with bs Smeller wake up mate.
[> [> Subject: Re: to Factchecker

to admin
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:54:47 11/24/20 Tue

The flaming troll is not just making serious accusations against you but to every other poster on this forum in his every stupid post.

Talking about one's childhood experience does not make one a pedophile.
[> [> [> Subject: Re: Statement that talking of ones childhood experience doesn't make one a pedophile

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 06:01:38 12/10/20 Thu

If someone tells a story of being sexually abused, and someone comments with "that must have been fun for the girls. You're lucky", then that person commenting is a pedophile. Everyone who doesn't condemn such comments are pedophiles. Anyone who gives positive feedback regarding child sexual abuse is a pedophile. Anyone who attacks someone for their disgust at others relishing in stories about sexual abuse is a pedophile.

If a women was forced to get naked and let herself be fondled by men, would you say " that must have been fun for them men. They're so lucky!". Would you say that? No. Few people would, because most people are against sexual assault. Unlike you, I'm not just against sexual assault of women, I'm even MORE against sexual assault of children, because they're defenseless and more easily taken advantage of.

The fact that you defend sexual abuse of kids (whether real or fiction) makes you a piece of shit deserving of death.
[> [> Subject: To admin: It's not unlawful to call you a pedophile, especially since you are one

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 05:42:52 12/10/20 Thu

You run a forum that caters to pedophiles, and so you yourself must be a pedophile, because only a pedophile would cater to pedophiles. If we were before a court of law, all the evidence I need is right here, in this forum for pedophiles that you're running. I'd love to hear your explanation as to why you're running a forum for pedophiles to write and relish in fantasies about the sexual abuse of kids.

[> Subject: Re: Questions from users

to admin
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:35:52 11/24/20 Tue

I think you are just giving fuel to this idiot troll.
He is even calling you a pedophile now.

You should have deleted and banned him a long time ago.
Trolling and flaming is also against Voy rules, in case you didn't know.

You gave him good advice "If you do not like what is written here, just walk away."
If he won't walk away then YOU should Make him go away as the administrator of this forum.
[> [> Subject: Re: Questions from users

Dr. Phil
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:23:06 11/25/20 Wed

Everyone, please understand that Factchecker is a troubled individual. He shows many signs of a man who was abused as a boy and is living a miserable life because if this.
He is trying to falsify the actuality of this sort of thing actually happening and has resorted to denial to support his fantasy. He copes with his disorder by believing it never happened therefore your posts supporting the factuality of this actually occuring pokes large holes in his beliefs.
The fact that he is lashing out towards those who post this and calls them pedophiles is a classic example. He is in serious denial!
Please understand that Factchecker has issues and needs help, not verbal abuse!
[> [> [> Subject: You're using the name of a quack. How fitting.

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 05:46:08 12/10/20 Thu

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.