Evaluation 2 -- Group One - 2011 CEI course

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:33:52 03/27/11 Sun
Author: Vivi
Subject: Evaluation 2

Hi, Girls
I simulated an answer for the evaluation of a WEBQUESTproposed by Ludi. I don't know if I am right.could you tell me please?

Evaluation II
http://questgarden.com/100/46/5/100407132539/index.htm

Movie Posters and the Meanings within them

Overall Visual Appeal
• (2 points) - Graphic elements sometimes, but not always, contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout
Navigation & Flow
• (4 points) - Navigation is seamless. It is always clear to the learner what all the pieces are and how to get to them.
Aspects Mechanical
• 2 points) - No mechanical problems noted.
Motivational Effectiveness of the Introduction *
• (1 point) - The introduction relates somewhat to the learner's interests and/or describes a compelling question or problem.
Cognitive Effectiveness of the Introduction *
• (1 point) - The introduction makes some reference to learner's prior knowledge and previews to some extent what the lesson is about.

Cognitive Level of the Task *
• (3 points) - Task is doable but is limited in its significance to students' lives. The task requires analysis of information and/or putting together information from several sources.

Clarity of Process *
(2 points) - Some directions are given, but there is missing information. Students might be confused.
Scaffolding of Process *
(3 points) - Strategies and organizational tools embedded in the process are insufficient to ensure that all students will gain the knowledge needed to complete the task. Some of the activities do not relate specifically to the accomplishment of the task.

Richness of Process *
• (1 points) - Some separate tasks or roles assigned. More complex activities required.
Relevance & Quantity of Resources *
• (2 points) - There is some connection between the resources and the information needed for students to accomplish the task. Some resources don't add anything new.
Quality of Resources *
• (2 points) - Some links carry information not ordinarily found in a classroom.
Clarity of Evaluation Criteria *
• (6 points) - Criteria for success are clearly stated in the form of a rubric. Criteria include qualitative as well as quantitative descriptors. The evaluation instrument clearly measures what students must know and be able to do to accomplish the task.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Evaluation 2 -- Tati Miranda, 18:57:58 03/29/11 Tue
- Re: Evaluation 2 -- Ludmila, 19:58:37 03/29/11 Tue