Olympic contenders do not pay more than we do, because they spend years in their respective sports funding their own way before they are even considered for the team. All competitive athletic activities come with a cost - and, all told, they are comparable. The real difference is that -- New Moderated Eastern Canadian Message Board

Click here for an easy and free way to help feed the hungry at The Hunger Site! Non-profit ad by Voyager

Support VoyForums by visiting our sponsor, www.PainEase.com.

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:01:13 12/08/11 Thu
Author: make it about the best dancers.
Subject: Olympic contenders do not pay more than we do, because they spend years in their respective sports funding their own way before they are even considered for the team. All competitive athletic activities come with a cost - and, all told, they are comparable. The real difference is that
In reply to: olympic contenders pay way more than we do... 's message, "The organization is the teachers of north america. Making the event smaller comes up year after year and gets voted down. It's not the event organizers who make that choice. Few schools have huge entries; most schools enter about ten-15 dancers. If they vote to tighten NAN, they may be voting out their students thus their reason for going. I'd LOVE for NAN to shrink; fewer judges, simple venue, simple awards - but then they'd be called cheap on the message boards." on 23:54:59 12/07/11 Wed

only a very few athletes make it onto the Olympic team in any given sport - about 15 per team, total, not per school. In ID almost anyone that breathes can make it to NANS, which means it really isn't a "major" competition at all - just a big feis.

The problem really is that everyone has gotten used to the expectation that they should be able to go "for the experience," regardless of their chances of recalling, let alone placing. Earning the right to be there is no longer the mindset. The competition has been watered down to an untenable level, because the focus is now on how to sustain the numbers and secure the huge venues, because we don't want to disappoint anyone.

The whole argument that teachers don't want to vote out their students doesn't hold water - you'd think they'd only want to send the best of their best. That's what competition is all about, after all - earning the right to be there, because your dancers are the best they can be, not because they're just there to fill a quota.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

The teachers voting thing is like asking politicians to vote in a pay cut for all politicians, or asking turkeys to vote for Christmas. Many teachers have (I use the word only very lightly) gotten as far as NAN (for experience) and treasure those moments and want them for their students. You may not believe it but it's true (NT) -- 0-, 12:11:39 12/08/11 Thu
- Fine. But then don't cal it a "major" competition, and don't make it a qualifier for Worlds. Because it's just a big feis that only the richest can afford to attend. It's no longer about the talent and the hard work that goes along with achieving a presitigious goal, but the $$, and the right to just go (NT) -- "for the experience", 12:20:29 12/08/11 Thu
- There's a difference between going for the experience and going because you've earned the right to be there. Any teacher worth their salt would want their dancers to go because they've earned it. Anything less is like flying a helicopter to the top of Mount Everest just to be able to say you've reached the pinnacle. Whom are you going to respect more, the flyer who went for "the experience"or (NT) -- the one who climbed up from the bottom?, 12:38:47 12/08/11 Thu
  - I thought everyone who attends NANs HAS earned it, according to the current standards set forth by the experts in this art form? I qualify by being in OC. I'll never be on the podium, probably will never qualify for World's, but I am still a very talented dancer and I have worked SO hard over more than a decade to earn the right to dance at this competition. I do cherish this tiny bit of glory at the end of the struggle. The teachers know best; let's let them decide who's worthy. (NT) -- Senior lady, 06:43:16 12/09/11 Fri
    - well said! (NT) -- congrats to you!, 09:28:32 12/09/11 Fri
    - "according to the current standards set forth by the experts in this art form" - Correct. However, the discussion is really about whether the current standards are a realistic and sustainable reflection of the level of talent in ID, or whether they are set this way simply to maximize participation (and economic benefit for the various associated businesses) in the event . You may work very, very hard at school and excel to the best of your ability, but when you get out in the world, vying for your "dream job," no employer is going to hire two "champions" to do the work, just because everyone works hard and is worthy.. (NT) -- that just ain't reality., 10:23:16 12/09/11 Fri

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2012 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.