Re: 2019 Patsy Ratings on LFN -- Colgate Sports

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08/18/15 9:26:13pm Tue
Author: The Future
Subject: Re: 2019 Patsy Ratings on LFN
In reply to: gate 's message, "2019 Patsy Ratings on LFN" on 08/18/15 8:46:06pm Tue

These are not the final ratings.

Colgate brought in 24 recruits not 16.

Basically,
Add 4 points for quality.
Add 5 for size
Add 1 for a kicker.
Add 1 for speed.
Add 2 for jumbo
Add 1 trigger.
Add 1 DB

Probably right around a 70. Maybe as high as 75 but probably not lower than 67. The teams that got reviewed later had more kids signed. It's inexact but a lot of work for the guys who do it. Not sure if they will revise them.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Re: 2019 Patsy Ratings on LFN -- gate, 08/19/15 8:18:35am Wed

Helpful Future, thx. Does seem they put this together prematurely but enjoy reading it every year. The references to Minaj and toothpaste were nauseating.

We seem least comparable to the rest of the field. So who are our 300# guys?!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]