VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09/ 1/15 5:13:40pm Tue
Author: Andy Kerr
Subject: Great post, 'gate80
In reply to: 'gate80 's message, "Navy 31 - Colgate 3, 1993" on 09/ 1/15 1:04:00pm Tue

I think this Board should be extremely grateful for your insightful and passionate renditions of Colgate football history. It really provides perspective on the significance of this juncture within a colorful 125 year history. Please keep this up. I love it!







>I did not attend the Colgate-Navy games in 1923 or
>1970, but I did attend the 3 Navy games in the 1990s,
>which spanned a turbulent period for Colgate football.
>The first of these games was in 1993, hardly a high
>point for the Raiders. WARNING - if you only like
>happy talk (apparently like our sportswriters who
>don't mention the score when Colgate loses), please
>skip this and wait for posts on Navy games in 97 and
>98.
>
>The 1993 schedule is the last where you can see the
>remnants of Fred Dunlap's vision for Colgate football
>- the first 6 games included Rutgers, Army, and Navy
>and 3 Ivies. That schedule at one time also included
>Syracuse and W&M, but they had to be dropped to make
>room for PL teams Fordham and Bucknell. Navy in 1993
>was coming off a 1-10 season, and when the schedule
>was made they would have been seen as an excellent
>chance for a win over a I-A team. However we were now
>entering the 5th year of the self-induced, spiteful,
>faculty-led gutting of our FB program, and we all knew
>we had as much chance of a win playing Navy as we
>would have had if we played Alabama.
>
>There was still a surprisingly large contingent of
>Colgate faithful attending these lopsided contests in
>the early 90s. We were thrilled a decade before when
>our schedules were upgraded and the future of Colgate
>football was bright, and were determined to follow the
>team against the remaining major opponents Dunlap had
>obtained. But the atmosphere at pre and post game
>tunks was funereal. We started the year in Giants
>Stadium, where Rutgers beat us 68-6, the most points
>ever given up by a Colgate team except for the 71
>given up to Syracuse (most scored by Jim Brown) in
>1959. Rutgers fans at that game asked me why we were
>downgrading our program, and fondly recalled the
>Colgate-Rutgers games in the 70s and 80s when there
>was a great rivalry. They said they were envious of
>the great alum and student support of Colgate's teams,
>and now doubted it would continue. I did not have a
>good answer for them. The following week we lost to
>Army 30-0 in a game that wasn't that close. We entered
>Navy's stadium like we were going to witness a
>friend's execution - we dreaded seeing what we knew we
>were going to see, but felt like we had to be there.
>
>I remember 2 blocked punts, at least 1 (and maybe
>both) returned for a TD on the play. The streak of
>unaswered points scored against us by I-A teams that
>year reached 115. Navy's QB had 4 or 5 turnovers
>between fumbles and INTs, which kept the score from
>being a lot worse. (The Navy QB was quoted in the
>papers the next day as saying "the game was
>disappointing as we expected to win 60-0".) There were
>Colgate players who performed great despite being
>outmanned on a program where the rug was pulled out
>from under them by their own school. RB Bill Sparacio
>had many tough, hard-earned yeards. (Sparacio had
>scored the first points of the season at Giants
>Stadium with an electrifying 35-yd TD run, before
>Rutgers responded with 68 unanswered points.) QB Chris
>Lane was chased and beaten up all day, before ending
>up on crutches with his knee torn up. New coach Ed
>Sweeney certainly couldn't be blamed for this sad
>state of affairs, though I got the impression from my
>observations during games and talk from insiders that
>while he inherited a bad situation, he certainly
>didn't make it better and probably made it worse.
>
>At postgame tailgating I was shocked to hear insiders
>say that things were going to get a lot worse before
>they got better, which hardly seemed possible. But
>they were right. Later that year we would lose for the
>first time to Fordham, the Rams' only victory in a
>25-game span extending from 1992 to 1995 (when we
>would lose to them again). I listened to the 1993
>Fordham loss on the radio, and Bob Cornell
>uncharacteristically sounded clinically depressed at
>halftime over the state of our fb program, and
>wondered about the future of it. Of course our 16-game
>losing streak from 1994 through 1996 lay ahead.
>
>A midwestern alum gave me our schedules for the rest
>of the decade. Mark Murphy had obtained great ones,
>including every Ivy, great I-AA match-ups, yearly
>games with Navy starting in 1997, games every other
>year with Army, and even a couple of tentative games
>with Rutgers and one with Vanderbilt. I was warned
>that many of these games would probably not take place
>given the spiraling downward of the program, and
>possible addition of Towson State (!) to our
>supposedly quasi-Ivy PL.
>
>Alums after the game were asking "Why?" George Langdon
>was no longer around to ask. He had resigned in
>something worse than disgrace - disgrace and ridicule
>- from his post at the American Museum of Natural
>History. His successor Neil Grabois had apparently
>recently asked at a public forum why Colgate even
>needed a football program. Tony of course was still
>around, though he wasn't in Annapolis that weekend to
>ask. We had destroyed the fb program to improve our
>academic profile, though it wasn't clear to us fb
>troglodytes how joining a league with Fordham and
>Towson State would help, and our academic standing
>around that time had predictably started to decline.
>Only airheads in isolated faculty lounge cocoons could
>think that destroying what made us unique would bring
>more attention to their academic endeavors.
>
>Current students and recent alums may be rolling their
>eyes at this, following 2 losing seasons and 6 years
>during which we have a losing record against LC and
>LU. But other than the 8 year Foley/Sweeney era at the
>height of the gutting, the last time Colgate had
>back-to-back losing season was in the early 60s. In
>the 10 years leading up to the PL we had played LC and
>LU 17 yimes and lost once. In the early 90s Colgate
>was half a decade removed from a dominating win over a
>good Army team in front of 40,000; a deacde away from
>being considered the strongest team in I-AA; a decade
>and a half from cracking the Div-1 AP top-20 and
>having bowl scouts at Andy Kerr. I can't emphasize how
>demoralizing it was at the time to Colgate fb fans to
>see our program drop to the very bottom of I-AA, and
>made worse by the fact that this was to a large extent
>self-induced.
>
>It was unbearably sad to watch a 75-year-old tradition
>crumble, and I for one had seen enough. The Navy game
>in 1993 was the fourth game I had attended that year,
>but I would not see another (with the exception of the
>1996 Richmond game which was - kind of - in my
>neighborhood) until we returned to Annapolis in 1997.
>By then things had changed.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> Re: Great post, 'gate80 -- Maven, 09/ 1/15 6:26:49pm Tue

>I think this Board should be extremely grateful for
>your insightful and passionate renditions of Colgate
>football history. It really provides perspective on
>the significance of this juncture within a colorful
>125 year history. Please keep this up. I love it!
>
Excellent indeed. I hope our new president reads it!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>I did not attend the Colgate-Navy games in 1923 or
>>1970, but I did attend the 3 Navy games in the 1990s,
>>which spanned a turbulent period for Colgate football.
>>The first of these games was in 1993, hardly a high
>>point for the Raiders. WARNING - if you only like
>>happy talk (apparently like our sportswriters who
>>don't mention the score when Colgate loses), please
>>skip this and wait for posts on Navy games in 97 and
>>98.
>>
>>The 1993 schedule is the last where you can see the
>>remnants of Fred Dunlap's vision for Colgate football
>>- the first 6 games included Rutgers, Army, and Navy
>>and 3 Ivies. That schedule at one time also included
>>Syracuse and W&M, but they had to be dropped to make
>>room for PL teams Fordham and Bucknell. Navy in 1993
>>was coming off a 1-10 season, and when the schedule
>>was made they would have been seen as an excellent
>>chance for a win over a I-A team. However we were now
>>entering the 5th year of the self-induced, spiteful,
>>faculty-led gutting of our FB program, and we all knew
>>we had as much chance of a win playing Navy as we
>>would have had if we played Alabama.
>>
>>There was still a surprisingly large contingent of
>>Colgate faithful attending these lopsided contests in
>>the early 90s. We were thrilled a decade before when
>>our schedules were upgraded and the future of Colgate
>>football was bright, and were determined to follow the
>>team against the remaining major opponents Dunlap had
>>obtained. But the atmosphere at pre and post game
>>tunks was funereal. We started the year in Giants
>>Stadium, where Rutgers beat us 68-6, the most points
>>ever given up by a Colgate team except for the 71
>>given up to Syracuse (most scored by Jim Brown) in
>>1959. Rutgers fans at that game asked me why we were
>>downgrading our program, and fondly recalled the
>>Colgate-Rutgers games in the 70s and 80s when there
>>was a great rivalry. They said they were envious of
>>the great alum and student support of Colgate's teams,
>>and now doubted it would continue. I did not have a
>>good answer for them. The following week we lost to
>>Army 30-0 in a game that wasn't that close. We entered
>>Navy's stadium like we were going to witness a
>>friend's execution - we dreaded seeing what we knew we
>>were going to see, but felt like we had to be there.
>>
>>I remember 2 blocked punts, at least 1 (and maybe
>>both) returned for a TD on the play. The streak of
>>unaswered points scored against us by I-A teams that
>>year reached 115. Navy's QB had 4 or 5 turnovers
>>between fumbles and INTs, which kept the score from
>>being a lot worse. (The Navy QB was quoted in the
>>papers the next day as saying "the game was
>>disappointing as we expected to win 60-0".) There were
>>Colgate players who performed great despite being
>>outmanned on a program where the rug was pulled out
>>from under them by their own school. RB Bill Sparacio
>>had many tough, hard-earned yeards. (Sparacio had
>>scored the first points of the season at Giants
>>Stadium with an electrifying 35-yd TD run, before
>>Rutgers responded with 68 unanswered points.) QB Chris
>>Lane was chased and beaten up all day, before ending
>>up on crutches with his knee torn up. New coach Ed
>>Sweeney certainly couldn't be blamed for this sad
>>state of affairs, though I got the impression from my
>>observations during games and talk from insiders that
>>while he inherited a bad situation, he certainly
>>didn't make it better and probably made it worse.
>>
>>At postgame tailgating I was shocked to hear insiders
>>say that things were going to get a lot worse before
>>they got better, which hardly seemed possible. But
>>they were right. Later that year we would lose for the
>>first time to Fordham, the Rams' only victory in a
>>25-game span extending from 1992 to 1995 (when we
>>would lose to them again). I listened to the 1993
>>Fordham loss on the radio, and Bob Cornell
>>uncharacteristically sounded clinically depressed at
>>halftime over the state of our fb program, and
>>wondered about the future of it. Of course our 16-game
>>losing streak from 1994 through 1996 lay ahead.
>>
>>A midwestern alum gave me our schedules for the rest
>>of the decade. Mark Murphy had obtained great ones,
>>including every Ivy, great I-AA match-ups, yearly
>>games with Navy starting in 1997, games every other
>>year with Army, and even a couple of tentative games
>>with Rutgers and one with Vanderbilt. I was warned
>>that many of these games would probably not take place
>>given the spiraling downward of the program, and
>>possible addition of Towson State (!) to our
>>supposedly quasi-Ivy PL.
>>
>>Alums after the game were asking "Why?" George Langdon
>>was no longer around to ask. He had resigned in
>>something worse than disgrace - disgrace and ridicule
>>- from his post at the American Museum of Natural
>>History. His successor Neil Grabois had apparently
>>recently asked at a public forum why Colgate even
>>needed a football program. Tony of course was still
>>around, though he wasn't in Annapolis that weekend to
>>ask. We had destroyed the fb program to improve our
>>academic profile, though it wasn't clear to us fb
>>troglodytes how joining a league with Fordham and
>>Towson State would help, and our academic standing
>>around that time had predictably started to decline.
>>Only airheads in isolated faculty lounge cocoons could
>>think that destroying what made us unique would bring
>>more attention to their academic endeavors.
>>
>>Current students and recent alums may be rolling their
>>eyes at this, following 2 losing seasons and 6 years
>>during which we have a losing record against LC and
>>LU. But other than the 8 year Foley/Sweeney era at the
>>height of the gutting, the last time Colgate had
>>back-to-back losing season was in the early 60s. In
>>the 10 years leading up to the PL we had played LC and
>>LU 17 yimes and lost once. In the early 90s Colgate
>>was half a decade removed from a dominating win over a
>>good Army team in front of 40,000; a deacde away from
>>being considered the strongest team in I-AA; a decade
>>and a half from cracking the Div-1 AP top-20 and
>>having bowl scouts at Andy Kerr. I can't emphasize how
>>demoralizing it was at the time to Colgate fb fans to
>>see our program drop to the very bottom of I-AA, and
>>made worse by the fact that this was to a large extent
>>self-induced.
>>
>>It was unbearably sad to watch a 75-year-old tradition
>>crumble, and I for one had seen enough. The Navy game
>>in 1993 was the fourth game I had attended that year,
>>but I would not see another (with the exception of the
>>1996 Richmond game which was - kind of - in my
>>neighborhood) until we returned to Annapolis in 1997.
>>By then things had changed.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]





Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.