[ Show ]
[ Shrink ]
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 09/10/15 12:59:38pm Thu
Author: lone ranger
Subject: Re: New USNWR Nat'l LAC Ratings
In reply to:
's message, "Re: New USNWR Nat'l LAC Ratings" on 09/10/15 7:06:06am Thu
>>>I hear what you are saying and your views are always
>>>shared by college presidents and admissions officers.
>>>That said, these rankings have shown to carry meaning
>>>to people who don't know better, should know better,
>>>and/or have an axe to grind.
>>>Who are these people? The first group includes
>>>international applicants who believe that there is
>>>some official i.e. US government recognition that the
>>>top 2-3 schools are just plain superior to any and
>>>others- as in USn&wr or maybe publications in their
>>>own countries. Then there are uber competitive
>>>and lazy counselors who would dismiss somewhat lower
>>>ranked schools for vaguely similar reasons e.g. tell
>>>them what they want to hear.
>>>But I reserve opprobrium for the axe grinders of the
>>>so-called A Better Colgate group who have been
>>>on for a few years now that Colgate slipped from spot
>>>16 to 22, artlessly - and therefore unfairly -
>>>any context such as the inclusion of the service
>>>academies in the group and breakthrough measures of
>>>quantitative and qualitative characteristics by many
>>>top schools including Colgate.
>>>And now that Colgate has improved its relative
>>>position in this list, we can rest easier while those
>>>who may be especially interested can evaluate the
>>>further. Not that you will hear much about it, of
>>>course, from the whingers.
>>>So with that as background, I would say that the
>>>improved ranking is good news. 19 is a better ranking
>>>than 22 if you are keeping score. Only Navy at 9 is
>>>above us in the Patriot League. Army, Bucknell, HC
>>>Lafayette are below us.
>>Now I know the reason why the field hockey program is
>>I will sleep soundly this evening.
>Did you now, zappa? You can thank me later.
>By the way, please tell me how USN&WR and these 2016
>rankings relate to field hockey and the Colgate team.
>Lesser men might have asked the coach, the AD, players
>or parents about the program.
I think someone's ascot gets a tad bit wrinkled when sarcasm is used on this forum. Guess I'll have to approach the subject this weekend.
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
[ Contact Forum Admin ]
Forum timezone: GMT-5|
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.