|[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]|
|Subject: Re: My Understanding of Female Superiority|
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Date Posted: 09:39:35 11/11/14 Tue
In reply to: micheleFFS 's message, "My Understanding of Female Superiority" on 11:04:51 09/30/14 Tue
>I'm glad to see this new forum. I hope others find it
>and that it succeeds.
>I have written some of my thoughts on female
>superiority and would appreciate criticism and
>suggestions, especially from take charge women who
>I feel female superiority has three main sources.
>1. Female's awesome ability to impart and nurture
>life. Males can't do this at all. Technology has made
>the male's function in reproduction optional for the
>female. This clearly places women in a dominant
>position in the human race.
>2. Women's tendency to greater emotional understanding
>and cooperation. This orientation stems directly from
>the woman's ability to impart life. She gives life and
>instinctively understands her own and others'
>feelings, fostering a desire to sympathize and
>cooperate. Males can achieve similar states, but most
>are conditioned to make this even more difficult than
>it naturally is.
>3. Women's ability to have multiple orgasms. Again,
>this clearly relates to women's ability to harbor life
>- for the race's survival, it's important that sperm
>have as great an opportunity to achieve its
>contribution to life as possible. Males, on the other
>hand, are oriented to distribute their seed as quickly
>and explosively as possible. Males must be trained to
>control their impulses to satisfy a woman who selects
>him as a sexual partner. Some males learn this
>relatively easily, many do not. A superior woman will
>derive great pleasure and satisfaction by training her
>Much has been said about males "getting in touch with
>their feminine side," frequently meaning wearing
>women's clothes. While wearing such beautiful garments
>can help males learn to empathize with women, I feel
>this emphasis is crude and misses the point. A male
>should aspire to be sympathetic, empathetic, slow to
>speak, quick to listen, and to fine points of
>agreement rather than searching, as so many of us do,
>for an advantage. When these attitudes are adjusted,
>the male wears feminine clothes as an outward
>expression of an inward change.
>A woman who enhances her beauty without being crude or
>immodest commands respect, even worship. Feminine
>lingerie, tastefully worn and discretely displayed,
>declares her superiority by accentuating her
>femininity and by arousing male desire, giving the
>male an opportunity to demonstrate respect,
>self-control, and a cooperative attitude of servitude.
Without doubt, female superiority exists in real life. I sure numerous mothers consider girls are more responsible than brothers despite of brothers' age. My boys are 15 and 18 now. Daughter is 14 but she is more responsible and sometimes much more smarter then older brothers. If boy deserve punishment, according to our rules it's traditional barebottomed spanking in front family. Culprit boy gets lying face down on ottoman - we name it "spanking bench" - with legs on both side of ottoman and pillow under hips. In this position bottom is elevated enough and buttocks are spread enough for clenching prevention. Since starting boys' puberty - for both it was about 12 - I moisten their behinds before spanking. This procedure increases sensitivity of punishment because my hairbrush works more painful on wet bottom and, other side, decreases "boyish smell", which is usual in their age. Earlier, when any from boys got punishment, daughter's duty was bring 2 wet towels - one for bottom moistening and second for wiping tears and snots after spanking. A few months ago I decided Lizzy is old enough for increasing her help to me and can moisten brothers' bottoms itself, of course, for beginning, under my supervision. The first time, when I offer her do it, she was dissatisfied - "Mommy, why I ought to wipe boyish dirty behinds?".
I explained her and boys that they are her brothers and she is old enough for assistance to mother in care for brothers. Moreover, in future she will have own children and now she gets lessons and expirience for future. Of course, boys protested, especially, Teddy, elder, - "Mom, Lizzy is child only, she can't wipe me!" I explained that, really, she is younger but she is smarter and never do such foolish and stupid acts as both boys. She representive me and carry out my orders. Now, Lizzy is very proud of my trust and, when any from boys ought to get my punishment and is lying on ottoman with bottom up, Lizzy moisten his buttocks by wet towel and throughtly wipes his crack. If bottom wasn't clean enough - it happens sometimes with both boys, especially, Tommy, younger, - Lizzy scolds them that big boys have to clean own bottoms after pooping better.
I can see boys' ears become red almost the same as will their behinds very soon. I think Lizzy's responsibility ought to be increase and, perhaps, I'll permit her to spank brothers - at least, younger. It would be good training for her future family life.
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
|Re: My Understanding of Female Superiority||micheleFFS||15:53:27 11/11/14 Tue|
Forum timezone: GMT-8|
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.