Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (required):

* Type your message here:
>Jim: I know a little more about NG than what the >average person might think. Obviously, you know more >about NG than I do. So let's have a discussion so >that we can all learn. > >First, I am a big proponent of single axis golf, even >NG golf, but let's not try to convince our readers >that NG is a scientifically superior method to hit the >ball long and straight. Why don't we leave "long" out >of it, and just say it's an excellent method to hit >the ball straight, with enough length to satisfy most >people. We don't want to fall into the "lying >trap"...know what I mean? > >You know, Jim, I have to be honest in that I have >never seen a NG model swing, coming out of NG, in >recent times. Jack K., now he had a so-called "model" >swing. Todd Graves, an NGCI, has a "model" swing. >Tom Sanders, ex-NGCI certainly had a model swing. >Even Junge kinda has a model swing. That guy in FL, >whose name I can never remember, NGCI, he, also, has a >model swing. In fact, most of the top NGCIs had more >or less a model swing program, where they tell the >students to swing like "this". > >What is this new model you are talking about? Do they >lift the hands over the head? Now, let's start >talking about my post, "How are you going to get all >the NGCIs to swing like the NG model, when all the >NGCIs have a model." How do you get all the NGCIs on >the same page, and on whose page? > >The executives at NG are not "smart" people, by any >means, but you don't have to be smart to run a >corporation. You just have to be smart enough to find >"smart" people. In other words, you have to know >where the hardware store is. Trust me, Jim, NG is not >stupid enough, even without going to the hardware >store, to revert back to using models in order to sell >NG. > >Jim, you seem to be in the know. Is NG going to start >using models to sell NG? Which model are they going >to use? This is all very interesting. I wish you >would edify us, as to NGs position, in this regard. > >You see Jim, this is the problem facing NG at this >time. They are not selling "model" golf. That's what >Jack K wanted to do. NG sells concepts, with four >principles. When you sell model golf you can easily >get everybody on the same page. When you sell >concepts and principles (yes, even your so-called >scientific "patented" principles) you get variety, and >it is difficult to get everybody on the same page. > >It will be interesting to see how NG does this, i.e., >get everybody on the same page. I will bet you a >dozen golf balls for your favorite charity that in >doing so that another lie will be created. Want to >take me on? > >You know, Jim, 20% of the salesmen make 80% of the >sales of a company. You know why? The fundamental >difference is that they don't LIE. If NG chooses not >to use a model (I don't think they will), then, they >will have a real challenge not to lie while moving >down that path because there is no way they can get >everybody on the same page,without a model. The whole >idea of getting everybody on the same page is an idea >that is a lie to themselves to think that they can do >it. That's the real problem for a corporation, and >that's when they start to believe their own BS (that's >not a swing method). And I am not trying to be funny >here. > >Jim, I'll tell you something else about not being >entirely truthful, as a corporation. It becomes too >difficult to keep your organization together, because >it starts to fragment. When you lie you start to >fragment and to get "haze", and people break off from >you to take advantage of the haze. > >As tiny as Natural Golf is right now, the whole golf >industry is watching to see if they can pull it off, >including the manufacturers of golfing equipment. >Bets are right now that NG won't be smart enough to go >to the hardware store, and they certainly don't have >any smart people there right now. (Remember I don't >use "smart" as a derogatory statement, but as Bill >Gates would use it, i.e., you lack sufficent depth of >knowledge to make the right decisions.) > >One industry pundit said it so well, about NG, when he >said, "Everytime they mark their golf clubs with the >patent designation, the guy running the stamping >machine should scream out to the executives, "liar, >liar, your pants are on fire." > >I tell Presidents of corporations to give their >secretaries and administrative assistants a hand held >air horn, and each time they hear and document a lie >(make a note) they get $100, for blasting the horn. >I'll virtually guarantee you that those horns won't >stop blowing for three months, when you are at a >corporation like NG. Sometimes it takes years, like >three years, to instill honesty within a larger >corporation. > > > >If, NG, does, in fact, try to get everybody on the >same page, you listen for the air horns. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>There is a lot of discussion about getting all the >>>NGCIs on the same page, and I always wonder, "what >>>page?" >>> >>>NG wants to move away from a Moe influence, i.e., a >>>swing limited to Moe's mechanics, and give the swing >>>more universal appeal. That was, essentially, the >>>major argument with Jack K. >> >>Natural Golf's swing model is backed up >>scientifically, and is the most effective way of >>hitting a golf ball long and straight. Moe happens to >>be the closest living human to this model. Every thing >>that Natural Golf teaches is backed up scientifically. >>I have been playing NG for more then five years now >>and have been through the changes. The JK way was the >>worst and far from what Moe actually did. The way that >>has been taught the last couple of years is "Natural" >>and much more powerful then what was taught in the >>past. >> >>Natural Golf is doing the right thing here. They are >>not trying to appeal to the masses, they have created >>a swing model that is backed up scientifically as the >>easiest to repeat swing for hitting a golf ball far >>and straight. You obviously have no clue what they are >>doing. Get a clue before you post. >> >>Jim

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.