[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]678910 ]
Subject: Re: Flooding the garden

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 08:10:28 07/24/22 Sun
In reply to: Ivana 's message, "Flooding the garden" on 06:56:45 07/24/22 Sun


I assume this was a chore Marek has been given before and was already well aware on how little, or in this case, too much water is needed. As long as the children are clearly aware what and how it needs to be done, then I completely agree a good, sound spanking is needed when they do a poor job at it.

It certainly sounds like Marek most definitely needed one in this situation, as well. I would have done the same, Ivana.

When you said you 'dried him off a bit', I assume you left the all-important bottom and thighs wet? As I think all of us can attest here, administering a sound and thorough spanking on damp bottom sends the message even more clearly.

Ivana, I first want to say I am in support of follow-up spankings. A child continuing to act up afterwards has been an extremely rare situation for me, I can't remember the last time it's happened. But I have given a follow-up hand spanking when it has. But I also have administered follow-up spankings when the kids have misbehaved away from home, which I consider more serious misbehavior, and I will give a follow-up hand spanking once we get home as a reinforcement and let them know how disappointed Mommy was with their misbehavior, especially if I had to spank at church. I also have given follow-up spankings when they have misbehaved at another home or earned a spanking under someone else's care.

But as for this situation with Marek, I am curious, but why did you end up giving the follow-up spanking if you indicated he "got the message" after your warning look? I am not trying to be critical, just trying to understand where your thoughts were going. But I think since he did receive your message from your warning, a follow-up wasn't needed.

That said, I wouldn't stop using follow-up spankings, because as I said I do support them and feel they have their place, but from the information I have been given here, I don't think it was needed.


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Subject Author Date
Re: Flooding the gardenIvana to Sarah08:52:34 07/24/22 Sun

Login ] Create Account May soon be required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.