You just said Rider was lower-level MAAC..Which is it? -- Siena College Basketball Fans Page

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:12:38 01/12/03 Sun
Author: Ramfan
Subject: You just said Rider was lower-level MAAC..Which is it?
In reply to: SaintlySaint 's message, "I never said Loyola" on 15:01:51 01/12/03 Sun

How many times are you going to go back on your words? First you say Rider is lower-level MAAC, then you say mid-level..Make up your mind and stop wavering. Loyola is not a "lower-level MAAC team"? What are they, then? There's not a big difference in the talent levels of the teams you named above and Loyola?

If you don't want Loyola mentioned, then don't say that Fordham has the talent of a "lower-level MAAC team". Should we start a separate category for Loyola? "Lower-lower level MAAC teams"? They are in the conference, right? And at the lower level?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: You just said Rider was lower-level MAAC..Which is it? -- SaintlySaint, 15:13:55 01/12/03 Sun
- Oh, ok. -- Ramfan, 15:19:35 01/12/03 Sun
  - Rider -- SaintlySaint, 15:23:08 01/12/03 Sun

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2012 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.