Date Posted:11:17 Author: Jimminy Cricket - 6 Sept 2001 Subject: Re: Re(5): Deleted Post In reply to:
How True - 6 Sep 2001
's message, "Re: Re(5): Deleted Post" on 11:16
"Ahh, so now we're finally hearing that SRF had 'some level of involvement' in the lawsuit against Ananda. I have a feeling we'll be hearing more about just how involved they were."
Don't be so haughty. This is just my own personal opinion. I could be wrong. As I said before, it would have been irresponsible for SRF and/or SRF members to be completely uninterested and uninvolved especially considering that some of the women involved were our friends, neighbors, church members, and co-workers. Again, this is just my opinion.
As far as Rapp, I believe he was asked to leave the SRF ashram because of his behavior. What about Kriyananda? After decades of sexually exploiting women while he was representing himself as a representative and channel of Paramahansaji and his line of Gurus - when will Kriyananda get the boot? In any case I don't think the example of Mr. Rapp is a particularly good one because SRF has done what the people at Ananda should have done over 30 years ago.
