VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:30
Author: ketch - 15 May 2002
Subject: Re: Mu/Atlantis continued
In reply to: dwayanu - 15 May 2002 's message, "Re: Mu/Atlantis continued" on 07:28

So, now you claim that when you said the Ice age ended suddenly, first in the southern hemisphere then later in the northern hemisphere you actually meant that it ended slowly.

Let us see what you actually wrote:

"The whole earth shook as the earth's crust was broken up and hot lava issued forth, boiling the ocean waters and sending vast amounts of water vapor and dust into the air. The ice age covering over the southern Pacific Ocean was probably shattered by smaller meteors along for the ride, sending countless particles of ice into the atmosphere. Altogether it was a cloud seeding operation on a tremendous scale, opening the sluices of the heavens and then raining for days on end. And as Mu sunk beneath the sea, a great tidal wave disappeared to the northwest and a smaller one to the southeast, carrying the already dead carcasses of wooly mammoths and other animals along with it, and the last Ice Age, as well as the last Golden Age, were suddenly brought to a devastating ending.
Atlantis suffered a similar fate approximately 500 years later, abruptly ending the ice age in the Northern Hemisphere."


This does not sound like a slow ending to me.

It is not in dispute that as the ice age gradually ended there were some periods of rapid warming and cooling. The Younger Dryas was a cold snap as the world warmed up. It was probably caused by changes in ocean currents, possibly as a consequence of fresh polar water flooding the Atlantic (where of course there is no lost continent to stem the flow).

"As far as the existence of Mu and Atlantis, as I explained earlier, before offering evidence about their existence, I thought it appropriate to address your position that it was impossible for them to have existed because there was been no cataclysm 12000 years ago that could have destroyed them. So, first things first.
First I am showing that in fact there was a cataclysm (or two -- five hundred years apart) approx. 12000 years ago. That is what my last post addresses."


This is the type of twisted logic which all of your arguments depend upon. I did not say that there was no cataclysm. It depends what you mean by a cataclysm, since major events are occuring all the time. What I dispute is evidence of a cataclysm on the scale which Paulsen claims. Storming Norman writes about the largest cataclysms in the history of life on Earth. These should leave absolutely overwhelming evidence, not just an increase in some trace elements.

Paulsen does not write about a meteor shower, but about impacts with Planetoids. That is the word he uses - Planetoid. That seems to mean somethinmg the size of a small planet. In other words something hundreds if not thousands of kilometers across. These are absolutely massive impacts. They would dwarf the impacts which may have wiped out the dinosaurs. If they had occured we would not be here now, in fact the planet Earth would probably no longer be in orbit around the Sun. Furthermore Paulsen writes about land impacts. The impacts are what destroyed the continents according to Paulsen.

You are grabbing at straws in trying to present the faint evidence in your previous post as supporting Paulsens claims. It does not.

"Now that it is established that there in fact was a cataclysm (or two) that could have destroyed Mu and Atlantis at about the time that Paulsen presents, and not only destroyed them by any means, but specifically by impacts from outer space, I will move on in my next post to discuss evidence of their existence."

You have not established any such thing. You need to show us evidence of the huge impacts Paulsen writes about. This does not support your standpoint.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.