Re: Mu/Atlantis continued -- KRIYA YOGA DISCUSSION BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:34
Author: Dwayanu-16May02
Subject: Re: Mu/Atlantis continued
In reply to: ketch-16May02 's message, "Re: Mu/Atlantis continued" on 18:33

You use the quote from Paulsen about the planetoid, but in the same passage you also quote that he calls the planetoid an asteroid. This is what I mean about your insistence on finding something wrong. Obviously, Paulsen is talking about a large asteroid and perhaps mistakenly refers to it as a planetoid. How large does an asteroid have to be to be called a planetoid? What the heck is a planetoid, anyway. So, you argue over silly details and try thereby to misdirect people.
Again, I will say, that I have not changed anything that I started out to say. The clarification of what "a sudden end to the ice age" means is what was attempted, in order to avoid pointless discussion due to misunderstanding. The fact is, THE ICE AGE ENDED SUDDENLY! Got that? Glaciers are still melting today, but what scientists generally refer to as the last ice age, ended suddenly. The conditons that produce and are conducive to the continuation of an ice age ended suddenly.
As far as the impact from the event that Paulsen describes being large enough to wipe out life totally, obviously that did not happen. So, obviously, the one that wiped out the dinosaurs was larger (I believe they say that one was about 6 miles in diameter, approx.) So, there is a lot of room between whatever your idea of a planetoid happens to be and the "pebble" that you refer to.
It seems that your only intention is to degrade Paulsen in any way you can, regardless of the facts. You just twist them to fit what you want.
At first you sound like you do not believe in UFOs, so I raise evidence about that. Then you say, well, you do not know about the others, but you certainly do not believe in Paulsen's UFOs. Then you say no such cataclysm could have occured that would be sufficienet to wipe out Mu and Atlantis, so they could not have existed. So, I show you research that you could check out yourself, but you avoid that and instead try to find something wrong with the way Paulsen described it that in your mind would justify you not looking into the research. You argue unendingly about what Pauslen meant when using the term "Christ Child," but even when I explain to you what he meant and how most other people who read what he wrote did not misunderstand it as you did, you do not really care. You just continue to cry that Paulsen lied. Well, I am sure that there are a lot of liars in the world if your own perception of what they say and do is the cosmic standard for deciding that.
C'mon, Ketch, when are you going to give it up and actually check out the evidence? The evidence of the cataclysm that destroyed Mu and Atlantis; the undeniable (at least by any REASONABLE standard) evidence that UFOs exist and vehicles and beings have been 'recovered' from 'crashed' ones, and you like many others are the victims of a tremendous campaign to obsure the truth fo these things. The evidence is there for any reasonable man or woman to investigate. I have given some of that evidence in previous posts. Do yourself a favor and check it out. Drop your own campaign to discredit Paulsen and try to find out the truth yourself.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Mu/Atlantis continued -- ketch-16May02, 18:36
- Re: Mu/Atlantis continued -- Dwayanu-17May02, 18:38
  - Re: Mu/Atlantis continued -- ketch-17May02, 18:38
    - Re: Mu/Atlantis continued -- Dwayanu-17May02, 18:39