[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]456789 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:15
Author: Ketch - 3 Jun 2001
Subject: Re: Reply To Ketch
In reply to: Mike Drake - 2 Jun 2001 's message, "Reply To Ketch" on 11:14

I am not sure that Yogananda ever mentions the twin star theory in his writings. Could you show where this is? He does mention Sri Yukteswars theory of world cycles. Bear in mind that Sri Yukteswar invokes the twin star theory as a means of explaining the procession of the equinox. The cycle itself certainly does exist (though probably over 26,000 years rather than 24,000 as Sri Yukteswar seems to have thought), and therefore Sri Yukteswar's astrology is not invalidated simply because he misunderstood the cause. In any even this does not form an important part of Autobiography of a Yogi. It gets a minor mention, possibly just to show that Sri Yukteswar as an accomplished astrologer.

On the question of using Burbank to give credibility to his teachings, there is good evidence that Burbank did approve of the Yogoda system (his written testimonial). If Yogananda's purpose was to give his teachings scientific credence then the testimonial is what is important. I doubt that anyone would be persuaded to believe in reincarnation simply because one botanist happened to believe in it.

The question remains of whether or not Burbank ever said the things which Yogananda writes. In truth we cannot be entirely certain, all we know is that Burbank later made some statements to the press which seem to contradict him. It would be interesting if we could find some statements on his beliefs from earlier in his life, to see if Burbank was a lifelong disbeliever, or if his views changed towards the end of his life.

If Yogananda did make a mistake it means very little to me. I make plenty every day. People who expect infallibility from others (whether guru or pope, are likely to be disappointed in my opinion.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.