[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]6789 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:16
Author: ketch-13Apr02
Subject: Re: Christ Child: continued for Ketch
In reply to: Dwayanu-13Apr02 's message, "Re: Christ Child: continued for Ketch" on 10:15

"In fact, woldn't it be better if none of us made judgements about things and people that we have not contacted personally?"

Are you saying that e.g. it would be better if no Americans had made any judgement as to whether George Bush or Al Gore would make the better president without having met them?

The fact is that we all make judgements about people without having met them. Paulsen has made himself a public figure by his activities. That was his choice. We are entitled to discuss these matters here.

From your many posts here which are both critical of, and patronising towards other posters whom you have never met it is clear that you also make judgements about people you have never met.

In any event we are looking to make judgements about the accuracy of the things Paulsen has written, rather than about Paulsen himself. As I said earlier, I cannot tell whether Paulsen is a madman, and believes the rubbish he writes, or whether he is just a fraud exploiting the gullible.

"You write,"His fantasies about Mu and Atlantis are another example which can be completely disproved." This is hardly the case. There is at least as much 'evidence' for it as against it, if we are talking scientific evidence."

Again you distort the facts. You have had plenty of opportunity to show us evidence for the existence of an island continent in the Atlantic 12,000 years ago. You have been unable to do so, as such an island could not have existed. If there is scientific evidence of its existence as you claim, then show us this scientific evidence.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.