[ Show ]
[ Shrink ]
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 13:53
Author: peer345 - 6 Jul 2001
Subject: Re: Calling the Org into Question
In reply to:
Thomas mark - 6 July 2001
's message, "Calling the Org into Question" on 13:37
it is good to see things laid out as clearly as you have done so. I agree with you 100%. It seems to me that SRF is so concerned with polishing its appearance to conform to a particular shape - Daya Mata's or not, i really don't know - that they twist the truth to the point where they are becoming quite empty and devoid of real content.
I say this because I went to a monastic's visit where I live which happens but rarely. I thought that at the talk he would actually say something. Well it was a polished and vacuous as the leaflets SRF put out for the voluntary league. It was a very nice talk but in terms of content empty - two stories of Daya Mata which related to nothing at all. One about her pet dog and how she hated to discipline it and one about her "revelation" after a deep meditation that all you needed was "love and service, love and service". I don't actually disagree with this latter point but in a talk you have to say more than that surely!
SRF make me angry. It is increasingly a church of Disneyland-like fundamentalisms. It is hard to trust the books by Yogananda from SRF - but we don't have much more to go on, some but not so much. They are still rich I guess but..........?
The privacy and hoarding nature of the organisation makes it one I feel very uncomfortable with. I very occassionally revisit the devotee-forum and the inanity of the discussions makes me wonder how I ever put up with it. I had question marks but overcame them thinking I just didn't quite understand. For me the changing of the photographs was the last straw - it is a lie I can't and won't support.
They have really moved towards a deification of Yogananda and that is something else I cannot support - it is finally a total disempowering of the individual and a move to an increasingly narrow literalism and its subsequant fundamentalism. It talks of the obssession with over-control by the organisation.
Daya Mata may have a strong spiritual energy and/or presence, I don't know having not met her but I think we all know this means nothing in terms of true spirituality.
That ends my rave!
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Re: Calling the Org into Question -- stephen, 16:14