VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678[9] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:52
Author: Mike Drake - 15 Jun 2001
Subject: Re: Taking the Discussion Further
In reply to: ketch - 15 Jun 2001 's message, "Re: Taking the Discussion Further" on 11:52

"Deriding" folks' beliefs? Please show me.

"Feign offense"? Please show me.

"Demand" a retraction? Once again, please show me.

Instead of issuing further fictional allegations, maybe you should have dealt with the argument: Defining 'prejudice' as merely preconceived belief leaves your statement trivial. (E.g., by that definition, I have a "prejudice" against the notion that the moon is made of green cheese.) But then all the other definitions that you yourself cite comport with what I claimed was the "normal" usage.* Since I take it that you did not mean to make a trivial observation, the only reasonable conclusion (as far as I can tell) is that you meant just what I said you meant.

But hey, Ketch - if you'd prefer to stand by your remarks, God bless you. It's your board, big fella.
___
NOTES

* I.e., they contain such language as "irrational", "hostility", "without knowledge/examination". The problem with this isn't that such a characterization is offensive - the problem is that it's wrong.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.