VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Thursday, April 18, 08:04:28pmLogin ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6]789 ]
Subject: no no no no


Author:
smurfgyrl
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: Friday, October 17, 03:01:59am
Author Host/IP: EATcf-677p201.ppp15.odn.ne.jp/220.212.33.201
In reply to: Evaluator 's message, "June Lightbourne" on Thursday, October 16, 11:12:33am

no way would i want this girl to represent tnt with such awful speech. she looks okay, not spectacular in my view

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> Subject: I agree with the speech


Author:
Evaluator
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Friday, October 17, 07:10:35am
Author Host/IP: c-76-101-51-85.hsd1.fl.comcast.net/76.101.51.85

i agree with you smurgyrl, her speech is kind of annoying too. She really needs to change her tone of voice I think. In regards to her look. if she gets that body into shape, lose a few pounds. She can do good. But, like this. I dont see her representing T&T any time soon.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: June totally deserved her top 4 spot at 2008 edition of Mag7...


Author:
Trini77
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Saturday, October 18, 10:44:48am
Author Host/IP: cpe-66-65-16-174.nyc.res.rr.com/66.65.16.174

...but as I said before, we could do better. Even Cennette (I hope that's her name-the girl who I said had the Maggie vibe) is better, even though I agree that her face is her weak-point. For me, it is apparent that MT&TW/U09 will both be crowned next year so I hope we get someone with some pageant experience-the only available possibility is Makeda because since Sept. Valene disappeared off the radar so I assume she is at college. I know PE&A will have to over-hall her entire look and definitely add hair extensions and I am pretty sure the body and look will be on-point for MU (if she did become MU09) but Makeda's MAJOR PROBLEM at the 2008 edition of Mag 7 was that she was like a dear staring at the headlights in the black of night. She is very intelligent but has horrendous stage fright in my opinion when it comes to on-stage interviews. It is interesting that I had said she was another "Danielle Jones" when she was selected as a top 7 finalist-because as it turned out her failure to advance any further was hampered by her answer onstage (which was Dani's downfall at MU2004). I know alot of people view poor answer as a lack of intelligence but I think we can all agree that Danielle Jones had "plenty brains" and yet she gave the most assinine answer by a MT&T that I have yet to see paralleled on an international stage. If Dani had nailed it I thought she would have been MU or at the very least top 3.

I guess the big question that will be answered next year is whether Peter Elias and Associates have already identified a strong contender already for MT&TU that no one knows about. Valene was the last invitee that we know about and she was phenomenal. I did not get the impression this time around that any of the 7 ladies who made the finals of MT&T08 had been encouraged/invited to screen by anyone on the MT&T committee. This is a very dangerous positionn to take in my opinion but then at the same time I have to admit that there has always been at least one very strong delegate at every MT&TU edition since 1995.
1995-Arlene & Michelle
1996-no pageant-Michelle from previous year rep. us.
1997-Margot
1998-the best slate of candidates for MT&TU/W up to that point ever-Wendy, both Miss Photogenics and the lady who placed 3rd overall. Wendy and the two Miss Photogenics were all top 10 MU material and that was the best delegate for East Indian descent to ever grace a MT&T stage.
1999-what a disaster in terms of beauty-a bunch of petty faces but no-one competitive enough-only Amanda Jardine was worthy but the 2 miss photogenics from 1998 were way better.
2000-Heidi (one of the most beautiful MT&Ts ever-if she was top 10 I am pretty sure she would have easily made top 5)
2001-Alexia
2002-Rhian Vialva-everyone else should have been sent home-what the heck were the judges thinking with that top 3?
2003-Faye, Maggie, Leah
From 2004 to the present PE&A have gotten the winners more or less right in my opinion.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Danielle didnt deserve that spot, I think


Author:
smurfgyrl
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Saturday, October 18, 03:18:02pm
Author Host/IP: EATcf-677p201.ppp15.odn.ne.jp/220.212.33.201

danielle jones in my view- even though im trini- did not deserve that spot. I just dont think she was strong, and there is no way even with the most amazing answer, would she have won.
Margot, Heidi, Faye, Wendy, Arlene were the best of the best. Rhian, at that time, was not ready, because she was very shy, was lacking that strong confidence and her speech was abit poor.
Cennette and June are just OK. Not standouts, im sure Peter will meet someone walking down the street who is stronger than both of them. There are so many models I see at Carnival time who can do well at MU/MW so hopefully he can scout a couple of them, dont worry.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Well...


Author:
Trini77
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Sunday, October 19, 07:16:39am
Author Host/IP: cpe-66-65-16-174.nyc.res.rr.com/66.65.16.174

...we disagree on Dani. To be quite honest, 2004 was one of the very few times that I had USA as my fav for the title-only 2008 comes to my mind in for USA ladies worthy of the MU title since 1995. Anyways, rumors are already circulating that PR will be the 2010 MU host. Peter Elias and Associates are going to have to "come good" this time with a tall, stunning delegate who can give the judges what they want in the interview-really, from the last few years I don't think intelligence is important as it used to be in the 1990s.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: ok


Author:
Evaluator
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Sunday, October 19, 08:14:09am
Author Host/IP: c-76-101-51-85.hsd1.fl.comcast.net/76.101.51.85

I agree with Trini77, I think Dani deserved her spot and could of done better if she had a better answer to her question. I also liked USA that year and had her as one of my favorites to win.

There was a rumor that croatia was going to host the pageant. I am very excitted to see who T&T is going to send.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: I though Croatia or Cyprus put in a bid for 2009...


Author:
Trini77
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Sunday, October 19, 12:46:37pm
Author Host/IP: cpe-66-65-16-174.nyc.res.rr.com/66.65.16.174

...I have only read about PR being a strong possiblity for 2010 and so people expect PR to place very high or win in 2009. Like yourself, I can't wait to see who are MT&TU09 and MT&TW09. I HOPE GABBY IS MISS WORLD 2008.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: You are right


Author:
Evaluator
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Sunday, October 19, 09:00:41pm
Author Host/IP: c-76-101-51-85.hsd1.fl.comcast.net/76.101.51.85

Croatia has a bid in for next year. I thought you were talking about next year for Puerto Rico. I missed where you said 2010. If they are hosting in 2010 then they might do good at MU next year. Who is going to be MT&TU09!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


[> [> Subject: HHEYY


Author:
Anna (OKAY)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Tuesday, October 21, 08:22:39am
Author Host/IP: NoHost/190.6.224.35

I think June was good at MT&T needs to lose some weight but with some coaching she'll be alright. And Gabby is spectaculer gives me hope that i could actually rep T&T....cuz i'm 5'6.5" Ha. I wish her all the best and she'll surely bring home the crown and title. As for PEA they should really have the local leg earlier than the usaual it will give them much needed time to prepare the delegates. I'm rather excited to see who will be choosen next year.Maybe i'll actually get to see a delegate in person as i'm planning to screen. Anyway all the best to Gabbi and Anya did a fanstastic job.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: o.k.


Author:
Trini77
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Thursday, October 23, 01:09:02pm
Author Host/IP: cpe-66-65-16-174.nyc.res.rr.com/66.65.16.174

...this is one of my personal quirks when looking at the MT&T delegates- I always look at how toned her arms are. June's arms look flabby. She need to literally lose at least 20 lbs if she plans to re-enter MT&TU-not a pound less.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: NO no no no no


Author:
smurfgyrl
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Friday, October 24, 03:55:33am
Author Host/IP: EATcf-573p174.ppp15.odn.ne.jp/218.46.103.174

Im just praying she never enters again. They are many other (better!!!) girls than her. like anya nathaniel or rhian vialva.
June is just okay. and again that speech is just way too bad. they will spend most of the time training her on how to answer questions

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Well...


Author:
Trini77
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Friday, October 24, 06:18:12am
Author Host/IP: cpe-66-65-16-174.nyc.res.rr.com/66.65.16.174

...in the Auntie Kim era, she would have been better than at least half of the MT&TU/W reps in terms of beauty. However, in this PE&A area she is really below the level of who PE&A usually have to train for MU/MW.

On another note, as I said in a previous post, MPU09 is 6 feet tall (saw somewhere where they had her height as 5'11" though-but either way)-we need a tall MT&T if we want to place in top 9 in the prelims and hope to crack the top 5. Gabby better win MW08 so that there is not issue about whether she should be sent to MU09. Really, all the most successful outfits crown their winners about 6 months or more before the int'al event-and that includes USA-because they elect state reps who are prepared before hand to compete at the national level which in my opinion is almost like a dry run for MU. Come on Pete, when are the screenings?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Anya Nathaniel...


Author:
Trini77
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Friday, October 24, 06:34:32am
Author Host/IP: cpe-66-65-16-174.nyc.res.rr.com/66.65.16.174

...would have to be groomed for a potential win because she has what it takes to make top 5 but she would need a boo job. Additionally, she always sounded intelligent when she spoke but I still think they would need like 6 months at least, to properly train her.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Maybe....


Author:
Evaluator
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Sunday, October 26, 08:48:35am
Author Host/IP: c-76-101-51-85.hsd1.fl.comcast.net/76.101.51.85

I see potential with her. But, I did not like the way she spoke. Maybe it is because she is still young. I do think that she needs a boob job and a little spunk to her personality. yes, they will need 6 months to a year to properly train her depending on how fast she learns.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Agree with you


Author:
Evaluator
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Sunday, October 26, 08:41:30am
Author Host/IP: c-76-101-51-85.hsd1.fl.comcast.net/76.101.51.85

if she has any plans of re-entering. She needs to lose some weight. I think if she do lose the weight and work on her speech she can do well. But, as I said if she continues to look like this she dont have much of a chance.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: O.K.


Author:
Trini77
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Sunday, October 26, 08:50:38pm
Author Host/IP: cpe-66-65-16-174.nyc.res.rr.com/66.65.16.174

Don't bite meh head off for this, but I don't think lookwise that June is as bad as some make her out to be. She does however need to loose 20 lbs. However, if she is under 5'9" then I would not bother.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.