VoyForums

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 03:09:19 04/10/09 Fri
Author: Lord Buckland
Author Host/IP: 82-45-86-54.cable.ubr01.gill.blueyonder.co.uk / 82.45.86.54
Subject: Re: obama's folly
In reply to: anthony 's message, "Re: obama's folly" on 13:36:35 04/09/09 Thu

The copy I read was a recent copy
so maybe it has been changed on the 'quiet'



>>Since when has NATO only been for western europe. I
>>have just read through the treaty and it says nothing
>>about being solely for western europe.
>>
>>North Atlantic Treaty Organisation -set up in 1949
>for the defence of western europe. To contain the
>expansion of Soviet union. NATO is a defensive
>alliance for the defence of western europe. Its no
>coincidence that apart from the US all it's other
>original members are western european nations. It
>never was intended to use this defensive alliance for
>offensive wars in eastern europe or Afghanistan. It is
>not or should not become a tool for American ambitions
>outside western europe. Somehow i would not be
>surprised if your treaty has been re written.
>>
>>>>>America & Britain cannot afford to fight these
>>stupid
>>>>>wars because the aims are to vague & beyond
>>>>>realisation apart from the colossal expense you
>have
>>>>>to deal with not one failed state but two -Pakistan
>>>>>who's government is riddled with je-haddists.
>>>>
>>>>Unfortunately the UK is a signatory of NATO, along
>>>>with the rest of Western European, which means we
>>have
>>>>to get involved with this war, as the September 11
>>>>terrorist attacks and the war in Afghanistan were
>>>>considered a direct attack on the USA by the NATO
>>>>alliance. I agree though, it is an unwinneble war
>and
>>>>a total waste of time, but what can you do.
>>>
>>>N.A.T.O. is for the defence of western europe, it was
>>>not designed to undertake wars in the middle east or
>>>Afghanistan. signatories of N.A.T.O. are under no
>>>oligation to under take any military operations out
>>>side the sphere of western europe. The other N.A.T.O
>>>countries are well within the treaty not to get
>>>invoved.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.