Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Ok let me start off: Im against monarchy, its elitist >and a waste of British peoples money and has no place >in todays society, however it does have good points >this is true, though these don't outweigh the need for >a fair system in the British "executive". This video >is utter crap and I cant sit here listening to crap, >it's these people that make republicans look like >arseholes.... > >Fallacy 1: >Anglophile = Means love of British (Not English?) and >that is somehow the same as Loving the >British/Canadian/Australian/New Zealand etc etc etc >etc Monarchy..WRONG > >Fallacy 2: Owns most of the world? What? Yes she has >large estates but the world is a very large place... > >Fallacy 3: The Saxe Coburg Gotha didnt come into power >in 1740 infact back then it was the House of Hanover >but yes they where from what we know as present day >Germany, which wasn't a country in 1740, and the >British Line didn't "die out" as this guy says, the >Catholics where overthrown. > >Fallacy 4: The average Brit doesn't know the real name >of the Windsors...Erm well what polls are these? we >learn it in school.... > >Fallacy 5: These are the people bankrupting the >economy new world order leader/ eugenicists. If they >where bankrupting the WORLD economy wouldn't American >tax dollars go to the Royals? If they where >Eugenicists why would they have allowed the >multiculturalisation of the UK? And The New World >Order looks increasing like China not the archaic >system of Monarchy? > >Fallacy 6: Groom of the Stool, ok this is the point >where I am thinking this guy isn't serious he cant >be..This position no longer exists, and if it did If >someone was employed to do such a job and "enjoyed" it >then its their business even though how disturbing >that sounds also what Lord holds this position today? >come on this would be BIG news today "they just keep >in quiet" oh but according to this guy some student or >lecturer in university has written about it today and >knows this intimate detail...Get real > >also on this point, Video 2 says that any "human" >would want going to the toilet to be a private affair >and to involve anybody else would be un-human. >So it that case the Romans who had public toilets as >in they all shat together where somehow "in-human" one >of the greatest/Republican/advanced etc civilisations >in the world are rendered in human because they openly >say together when going to the toilet...dont be >stupid! It sounds silly today but it doesnt make you >"un-human" wtf... > >I'm sorry but media bullshit pisses me off. Some poor >yank is gunna listen to that shit and believe it, not >all but some will. > >Im not a fan of the queen, but this aint funny nor >true...
Choose Message Icon: None :-) Happy ;-) Wink :-D Joy :} Smirk <:-} Innocent ☮ Peace >:) Mischief B-) Shades <3 Heart |O Yawn <:P Sick >:-( Angry :~( Sad ? Question *!* Alert Thumbs Up Thumbs Down (!) Idea [Info] Info Oo. Talk [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.