Friday, May 2, 2008 - New servers are in! Click-in for more info!
VoyForums

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]4 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:05:47 03/30/07 Fri
Author: Grumpyoldman
Author Host/IP: 85-210-19-208.dsl.pipex.com / 85.210.19.208
Subject: Re: Drake started the slave trade
In reply to: Martin 's message, "Re: Drake started the slave trade" on 13:23:24 03/30/07 Fri

>>>> I would
>>>>challenge Martin to tell me the name of a single
>>>>African Power that supported Great Britain in her
>>>>Policy of Abolition and ENFORCEING it so
>>effectively.
>>>>I am prepared to accept that there may have been one
>>>>but I am not aware who.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I think that's a rather unfair question - the
>Africans
>>>who were enslaved were very much opposed to the
>trade,
>>>but obviously they weren't a 'power' or they wouldn't
>>>have become slaves!
>>
>>
>>Why is it an unfair question? Certainly the
>>individuals who
>>were enslaved would not have been too happy about it
>>any more than the Royalist Prisoners taken at the
>>battle of Worcester (1651) would have been too happy
>>about all those below the rank of Captain being sent
>>to the Fever Isles (the West Indies to you and me) as
>>slaves by Oliver Cromwell. The point is that although
>>it may be fashionable for people today to write off
>>the West African Kingdoms as so inferior to Europeans
>>that they could not decide for themselves if they
>>wished to join in the slave trade, they were not.
>>They could and did conduct diplomacy, control trade
>>(especially in slaves)enter into treaties, maintain
>>armies and all the other activities of a state. They
>>could have resisted involvement in the slave trade and
>>had they done so it is improbable that it would have
>>become as large or as lucrative as it did. It would
>>not have been economic to conduct on such a large
>>scale. So the question remains which African state
>>in Sub-Sahran Africa was prepared to support Great
>>Britain in suppressing the Slave Trade?
>
>If you're looking at the people in central Africa who
>bewcame the slaves, you're mainly looking at
>small(ish) tribes and not 'states', so the question is
>one that can't be answered.
>
>It's similar to asking "Which European Great Powers in
>1914 were not Empires or did not have colonies?"


My point is that the West African Kingdoms controlled the supply of slave to the ships and without them the trade could not have developed as it did. I don't think there are any records of which tribes were particularly preyed upon at that time.

To simply say that the only people who were involved were either White British slavers or Black African victims is wrong. My argument is that one of the main reasons why the west now abhors slavery is the change in attitude that Great Britain spearheaded, and her policy of effecting the ban.

The Black African Kingdoms on the west coast opposed the policy, and when the interior was opened up the Bornu Confederacy opposed the anti slavery policy on the grounds that it always had been that way. Tippu Tib set up a central African state in the 1870s based on slaves and ivory.

If you say that the only Black Africans whose involvement matters were those who were enslaved then I think that you are being selective about African involvement.

Which ever way you look at it the impetus to change things came from this country, the cost in blood and gold of suppressing the slave trade was born by this country and now 200 years later in a supposed celebration of the suppression of the slave trade Great Britain is in fact being pilloried.

And it still leaves the question that there were many organised and comparatively sophisticated independent black African states who could have supported us, if only by ceasing to trade in them with the Americans, Spanish, Portuguese, "Arabs" to name a few after the second Act in the 1830s. The Royal Navy had to maintain anti-slaving patrols right up the end of that century.

I think the trouble is that this issue is usually only seen in terms of race and colour. We have also, for nearly a generation, been told that everything Great Britain has ever achieved was worthless and this so- called celebration of the abolition of slavery is simply another example of it.

But there still wren any Black African powers who were prepared to support us.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.