Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>how is using winston churhill a bad example his >>devotion to the monarchy doesnt come into it, my point >>was that if he had been president people would still >>be devoted to the country and him, it doesnt matter >>whether it was churchill or another person if we were >>a republic then there wouldnt have been less >>patriotism and duty from every individual of this >>country. I didnt say the queen doesnt have a sense of >>duty, but it is a duty that shouldnt belong to her >>without the peoples permission, we are meant to be a >>democracy afterall and if she had so much duty then >>she should be able to be held accountable, when we >>have a monarch that isnt as cherished or is around as >>long or is as "good" as the queen then the majority >>will have a different opinion. what does she do that >>an elected figure head cant do? > >for starters not having a political agenda or >political bias, like Labour, liberals or >conservatives. the advantage of having a queen or king >is that they can form realy good relationships with >nations because they are there for life but a >presedent comes and goes. tony blair went, gordon will >one day go and if cameron becomes PM on day he will go >but its possible that the queen will still be around >to represent our country. added point- the queen is >the traditional head of the country, its ok to move on >with the times im not saying it isnt but... there is >no reason for not holding on to the bit of our great >past. the monarchy as it works now works for the >nation and if we converted back to when the monarch >ruled surpremly it would work still. with a presedent >u dont get that air of continuality, you cant be >proude of a presedent because they come and go but u >can be proud of a monarch. and because a pm only >represents one political movement or purpose they do >no speak for the whole nation. plus theres the >Commonwealth something like 1billion citizens that >believe in her as head of state, also the powers that >the queen or any monarch hasnt used in centuries. and >also the queen is accounterble to the people just as >much as any politician if she does something wrong the >people speak out about it. i bet that id diana was >still alive and if there was anychance of her being >Queen people would think it was ok 2 surport the >monarchy. and one final point- having a king or queen >is unique and seperates us from the world, it is >partly why so many tourists come to britain everyday.
Choose Message Icon: None :-) Happy ;-) Wink :-D Joy :} Smirk <:-} Innocent ☮ Peace >:) Mischief B-) Shades <3 Heart |O Yawn <:P Sick >:-( Angry :~( Sad ? Question *!* Alert Thumbs Up Thumbs Down (!) Idea [Info] Info Oo. Talk [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.