VoyForums
GIVE FREE FOOD
www.TheHungerSite.com
-> Click Here <-
Fund Free Mammograms with a Click
www.TheBreastCancerSite.com
-> Click Here <-
Non-profit ad served by VoyForums...

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789[10] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thursday, December 27, 10:57:04am
Author: Peacock
Subject: Re: St. Peter's history.
In reply to: PoconoPhil 's message, "Re: St. Peter's history." on Thursday, December 27, 10:40:23am

Our history would have nothing to do with getting into the Big East. Few realize it, but most of our administrations never wanted that type of opportunity. Hell, even Seton Hall was not wanted, but only got in because Rutgers turned it down.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: St. Peter's history. -- college BB fan, Thursday, December 27, 02:49:39pm [1]

Wrong! Ru was Never even considered. The ONLY reason that SHU got in (as an after thought)was : HOLY CROSS turned down the Big East. ASK DAVE G.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> BS, Rutgers was always considered superior to SHU -- Peacock, Thursday, December 27, 03:17:37pm [1]

HC had nothing to do with it. It was a geographic necessity for a NJ team and SHU was a garbage program at the time versus Rutgers. Gavit never was known to tell the truth anyway if it reflected bad on the BE.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: BS, Rutgers was always considered superior to SHU -- Fraedo, Sunday, December 30, 11:14:08am [1]

Garbage program? At least Seton Hall had a gym with parking.


[ Edit | View ]



[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2017 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.