VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sunday, January 04, 04:12:10pm
Author: Peacock
Subject: Re: Dunne's comments
In reply to: oldtimer#1 's message, "Dunne's comments" on Sunday, January 04, 10:23:11am

You do have a problem evaluating this coach and I suspect that you do have some relationship with him. There are so many issues that one can see at the games that argue against your cutting him some slack. He may know the needs, but if the guard position is any factor, he certainly seems to have no clue on evaluating the talent he needs.

Three seasons and a unbelievable inability to even master out of bounds plays. The lack of any real structure on offence, spastic personnel use. One can yell about lack of talent but the lack of performance even surpasses D3 ball. You came to the defense of Leon at the point a few days ago, and in that shows an unwillingness to recognize that he is one of the worse choices as a point guard. As much as you tout objectivity, you show very little in your own opinions. Yes we are forced to sit out an unwarranted extension, but that is no excuse to continue to give Dunne the pass he seems to be getting from a select few.


I know you don't like comments from outsiders, but at least the ones I cite are made impartially with little to benefit their team. One poster made the following observation on today's game

"Not sure I can say much after watching just 20 minutes of a team, but St. Peter's has to have one of the worst offenses I've seen all year. They have no one that can really "create", they have no construction ability, and the ball is constantly being dribbled. I'll bet they don't score 45 in this."

When you have as many games with similar performances, records are meaningless. If you don't know what I mean, it was his use of the phrase "construction ability" that indicts Dunne the most. Many a poor team with minimal talent shows better at execution than we do.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Re: Dunne's comments -- oldtimer#1, Sunday, January 04, 05:15:13pm [1]

Please don't take my lack of response to your post as validation of your point of view. Just keeping my word of not dealing with you. I've found that it is a waste of time and energy.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Being the board apologist is right enough answer -- Peacock, Monday, January 05, 02:04:05pm [1]


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.