VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thursday, March 27, 06:36:49pm
Author: loyal
Subject: Re: Brandon Hall signs with SPC
In reply to: jajk 's message, "Re: Brandon Hall signs with SPC" on Thursday, March 27, 06:06:47pm

I know our options, as currently constituted, are slim.....but..... but Lampley and Leon are very poor perimiter defenders....opponents guards would penetrate at will and score or dish off...with one (Bacon) adequate -only Division One capable defender on the back line.....we would stop no one and get creamed on the boards.

Unless our next player is a "3" who can step in and score right away or a big rebounder/defender at the "5"....both unlikely scenarios...it will be the play in round (SPC invitational) again for sure.

Darn!!!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Brandon Hall signs with SPC -- figgyprez, Friday, March 28, 11:18:46am [1]

I agree about style. But the question really is whether the staff can play a style which fits what they can recruit because it is less likely that at the SPC level we will play a style which kids will just yearn to play in since any style is available at more elegant places. It really is no different than at Seton Hall where Gonzo wants to press and run but will find it difficult to get the athletic bigs necessary for the back and front of that style. He will always beat SPC and St. Francis with it but he will never be more than middle bottom in the league causing him to flirt with the NIT but not the NCAA and eventually cost him his job. So the point is if SPC can recruit guards 3's and smaller, athletic 4 types we might as well play without a 5 and swarm with everyone else. To do it straight up will be a disaster as loyal suggests so we must change style to meet available assets. Frierson played courageously vs St. A in TOC title game but was overwhelmed by numbers and talent. Not a 5 but could be a slashing type 4.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Brandon Hall signs with SPC -- oldtimer#1, Friday, March 28, 12:42:51pm [1]

Excellent point! There are very few 5's out there and the MAAC in particular is not a league of 5's but rather rebounders who can slash and run. However, I do agree with Loyal that we need scoring power almost as much as we need rebounding. We also have a lot of unanswered questions on our bench. Hogga for one, and whether Gooding will continue to be a roll player or thrive in an uptempo game. Wish Leon had Lampley's quickness and Lampley had Leon's shot. Add to this the unknown skills of Conley and Hall and we have many unanswed questions.


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.