VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Monday, April 07, 11:51:51pm
Author: Peacock
Subject: Yes you did
In reply to: Sludge 's message, "There you go again........" on Monday, April 07, 07:32:05pm

You specifically challenged in order, Mumford, Costner, Lampley, and Hogga and also asked about their quality. Or did you really believe that their quality is a 6 win team. You have also implied it about Shumate. You hide under the guise of skillful writing but practice the McCarthy tactics of the 50s. You asked where their résumé’s were as if you had no knowledge of their accomplishments in HS.

I know being a skilled politician is your desire but you have been as transparent in touting the stories from within with pleasure. Your best comment was on Hogga's defense which I doubt was intimate knowledge on your part.

Are you not the same guy who wants to blame the administration for the inability to get good players. If am not mistaken you even once blamed the garage.

And finally you even again practice making statements that are not exactly on the money. You come out when simple questions were made on the performance of the staff and respond about agendas. There are no agendas, other than yours, only questions about the obvious what all see. You struck with the vengeance of a defender of the faith when simple questions were asked. The more negative comments came because of your defensive responses. The need is to wonder why that balanced approach of yours is so soft hearted on the performance of the staff. You were not balanced but completely and totally for the staff as if they hardly played a factor in the poor performance using nothing more than throw away comments as criticisms aganst them. In this you are identical to the Siena faction that defend their absurdities.

Back down all you want now, but you continue to still make an issue about talking about the defections, when in fact you have been the only one who pre-emptively initiated those thoughts. Maybe someone is going to go and that in it self casts doubts on the staff when one ties in the issues of last season. You make more trouble for the school because you bring to the surface the issues that are suspect by trying to defend them. Even your Leon Lampley comment is a great example of that issue.


Other than your self and some other great evaluator, not one has come to the defense of Leon at the point. An God Bless you, because with this comment you actually expose your inability to see what most others do. And then you defend it by saying the staff couldn't see it.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Are you the father of revisionist teaching? -- Sludge, Wednesday, April 09, 01:41:37pm [1]

Either you fail to to absorb my sarcasm or refuse to comprehend what was written.

You overstated the talent of virtually all that was brought in last year. I made my opinions known by cautioning on the qualifications of such as Costner, Leon, Hogga, and Mumford. How quickly you choose to forget. On the other hand, how else does one make his case.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> By asking -- Peacock, Wednesday, April 09, 06:39:27pm [1]

Was this team as bad as their record or a product on inept handling. Not only did they have the recruits, but two former All MAACers and a promising sophmore.

Your failure to even consider poor managment as a more than an incidental is monumental.


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.