Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: what do you mean? -- Sludge, Monday, April 21, 09:24:04pm [1]

Defections, non-qualifiers.

Thought you might be asking what was meant by Peacock....."but my real concerns lie more on other factors than the players".

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: what do you mean? -- Peacock, Monday, April 21, 11:48:17pm [1]

If you don't know what I meant, then I have to assume all your potshots were made without thought.

Who among the four are non-qualifiers?

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: what do you mean? -- Sludge, Tuesday, April 22, 09:29:58am [1]

Just making light of your "transparencies".

One of the four has yet to qualify. Hope that narrows it down.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Not difficult to guess -- Peacock, Tuesday, April 22, 01:19:07pm [1]

Based on PSAL performance, you could see hew way I lean. If factual, then Dunne better be certain as the slot is tied up for a period of time now.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Maybe -- Sludge, Tuesday, April 22, 07:09:10pm [1]

If one uses past PSAL performance as the measure.

On the other hand, one has to ask the question; why would Dunne choose to extend his last and most recent ship, one presumably his most valuable, to someone who has yet to project?

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Maybe -- Peacock, Tuesday, April 22, 11:49:24pm [1]

Rather simple. Many kids can not qualify until they get their final grades in June. They would have the SAT score but need a specifc average at the end of the year. Some are right on the cusp going into the last semester that projection is not a guarantee. However some are close enough to feel they will get it or if not, can be brought up to level through summer classes. I just don't think Dunne would take a chance on a kid that would not make it in the late period. Now of course a fall signing could also become a question, remember BK. Can't fault anyone there, and as you say the PSAL has a phenominal record of non-qualifiers, so I believe that Reid will be the case. But of course, you probably already know.

[ Edit | View ]