[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456[7]8910 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Saturday, September 13, 03:38:18pm
Author: Sludge
Subject: Re: Eugene Teague
In reply to: Peacock 's message, "Re: Eugene Teague" on Saturday, September 13, 12:59:34pm

Always comforting to know you have my backstroke in view.

Was only reporting and attempting some speculation on what consequence this might have on us. Be assured, I know to defer to your more factual assets, given your capacity to access intermediaries that can provide more accurate review.

Speaking of inspections, have you anything to add to your encouraging report on Hill?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[> [> [> He is not a stiff -- Peacock, Saturday, September 13, 04:11:33pm [1]

Lets wait until thye really have to play.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: He is not a stiff -- Sludge, Saturday, September 13, 04:33:08pm [1]

Not aware of anyone calling him a stiff. Better we call him a late bloomer in development. Word is that, despite his size he is more of a face up, wing-type in style. On the positive side, reports are good on CJ, someone I may have been more dismissive of earlier. Big body who can fight inside as well possessing wing skills. My quess is, he, Gooding and Bacon up front. Could go with three guards, but who is the third. Much too early for any talk, besides, wouldn't want my backstroke examined too closely.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> You would beat Phelps with that one -- Peacock, Saturday, September 13, 04:44:28pm [1]

Down in Houston Hill was forced to play the post. He wants to play the wing, but his whole experiance is at center. Not to say he would excel at D1 but one needs to remember what position he did play in HS. He is not foreign to the post but possessing an outside shot does peg him for a wing. He will see time at both places and he does know how to rebound.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Why is it so difficult to just say you agree -- Sludge, Saturday, September 13, 05:40:34pm [1]

Hill will not be a D-1 post player, either because of his physical attributes, style, or inclination.

Maybe you are comforted if I simply say....I agree with you.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> And you expect the post to be? -- Peacock, Sunday, September 14, 12:03:05am [1]

For 40 minutes a game?

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> And my response -- Sludge, Sunday, September 14, 08:12:42pm [1]

Wouldn't get past the introductions.

[ Edit | View ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.