VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8]910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wednesday, April 09, 01:27:07pm
Author: Sludge
Subject: You show further lack of understanding
In reply to: Peacock 's message, "No overhyping them, just liking them" on Tuesday, April 08, 12:02:08am

Quite the contrary. Your agenda demands that you triumph the recruits and JD's efforts here if only to advance your argument that he can not transfer this "superior" talent to the playcourt.

Further once more. I did not denigrate the recruits but only to suggest that they were not as talented as some had projected.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> You are the Biggest hypocrite on the board -- Peacock, Wednesday, April 09, 06:35:12pm [1]

You assign agenda at will but never acknowledge your own. Never saw a more blatant example of an agenda than your feeling than Dunne could not have done better than six games ( and 3 from Dec on) with this talented group. Glad to see your support for such lowly accomplishments.

One only needs to read what you post to understand the negative bent. I do understand that you don't have any real understanding and need to maintain what appears to be a neutral approach while spouting the reasons why these recruits are not that good. One only needs to read your post on the current crop to see through your transparent feelings. Yes the group was not upper division qulaity out of the shoot, but they also were not six win qualtiy unless you want to comment otherwise.

I just don't remember when SPC got as many NJ All Staters than he has. Strange how you love to quote questionable recruiting schools but lack understanding how that information comes out. By the way, Hall was 1st team All Group 4, and fourth team All State. And I guess liking him doesn't fit your lofty goals.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: You are the Biggest hypocrite on the board -- petersfan, Wednesday, April 09, 08:28:24pm [1]

third team all state; same as Gio Fontan


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> I'll be kind and characterize your falsehoods as merely misspeak -- Sludge, Wednesday, April 09, 08:48:51pm [1]

More of the same rubbish from you. Repeat often enough and some will begin to believe, must be your mantra. Not sure sometimes why I allow for some measure of legitimacy to your absurd remarks by submitting a response. Maybe it is in the hope that you are capable of at least some absorbtion of reason(ing).

Quickly for the learning impaired.

- NEVER have I ever stated or implied the Dunne could not have done better than six games.

- NEVER have I said that out recruits were no good (assuming you were talking last year's crop). Rather, said before, during, and after the season that they were not AS GOOD as many on this board had projected.

- NEVER said this current group (as presently constituted), was not good. Said that, on paper, does not look as good as last year's class based on pedigree and from a list of the schools that we were competing against. Gave no specific mention to Hall's creditials other than to include him in a group that; I will repeat....... DOES NOT APPEAR ON PAPER TO BE AS GOOD AS LAST YEAR'S CLASS (ON PAPER).

Enjoy your world of black or white.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> You are the prefect candidate for Survivor -- Peacock, Friday, April 11, 05:00:06pm [1]

You have all the traits and hidden comments of the successful there.

I have to assume than you have NEVER said anything. Why you ask? Too many weasel words typical of you and never voicing an opinion on the topic but always choosing to criticize other posts. Its OK to go after the delusional, but much of the topics on last years team was far from delusional, but more of responsibility. At no point did you ever step up on the overall coaching of the team as it applied to the performance. It was always some cerebal comment on the nature of the players.

Assume this will be done for now, but wait for some future shots that hold little to the issue at hand.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> And now that you mention -- Sludge, Saturday, April 12, 03:40:17pm [1]

Your personality bears a resembelance to a certain judge on American Idol.

Now that we have all engaged in the mastications of personal assasination, can we get back to more mundane issues such as the makeup of the squad next year, candidates for A.D., renovations to Yanitelli, etal?


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> And you don't think he knows of what he speaks -- Peacock, Saturday, April 12, 04:23:25pm [1]

Or do prefer the other two that give 85 to 100 praise.

Actually have more interest in the releases of Iona. Was wondering how they could offer as many guards as they did. Now we know.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Have no interest in any of these "performances" -- Sludge, Saturday, April 12, 07:01:01pm [1]

Whether celebrity or reality show, all are staged to take in the gullable, cathartic viewer. Might sit well with the delusionals that enjoy these mindless productions.

Williard looks like the second coming of big Jeff, only with a better brand of lipstick. You can generally count on three "defections" from the New Rochelle campus each year. Usually it's the classroom or the "rules" that help thin the herd. May have room for another, since Machuado (sp), is not expected to project.

Interesting takeaway our of P'town; seems that Brady was shopping himself from the moment he crossed the Hudson. At least Teddy waited a few year's :-)

By the way, heard a good report on Hall. Sees the floor well, pass first mentality, not a shooter or scorer, but an excellent DEFENDER. Dare I say: still waiting for our herd to trim.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Somehow I don't think you like to be entertained? -- Peacock, Sunday, April 13, 05:53:16pm [1]

must be a golf addict, which falls under the same comments you just made on the shows. A group of delusional people wasting thier lifes away just counting the occasional decent shots that make them think they are great. Might even think it is a health benifit.

By the way, what can be more mindless than watching the actions of this country and our beloved leader.

Iona has always been an outlaw school, which is why I like watching them. I like the western flicks.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> You never cease to disappoint -- Sludge, Monday, April 14, 09:27:17am [1]

You simply can not avoid the invectives, the personal mischaracterizations. Must be much more satisfying for you than to have to engage in a sport that encourages social interaction among the participants. For you, solitaire might best fit your personality, allowing you to enjoy your sport without recourse.

Keep spiking with the political. Presumably, as a product of the Hudson County mob machine, you know full well how the corrupt game is played.

Unlike your game, at least in golf we occasionally do make a decent shot.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Invectives? -- Peacock, Monday, April 14, 12:31:44pm [1]

Is not "social interaction among the participants" a euphemism for Republican rich cats. More possibly a substitute for the back room of the HC mob machine. Not exactly a blue collar sport, or do the occasional wannabees count.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> All those fat cats? -- Sludge, Monday, April 14, 01:34:33pm [1]

You mean those such as the Corzine's, the Rockefeller's, and all those other guilt riden, condescending elitists that frequent such selective and off limit compounds as the one standing on Rockland Road in Wilmington?

Maybe we should look into the questionable actions of the hosts here for misdirecting all those ill gotten profits toward outrageous pensions and health benefits for their fat and unappreciative retirees.


[ Edit | View ]



[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.