VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8]910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Monday, May 05, 11:22:29am
Author: Peacock
Subject: Not to Disappoint
In reply to: petersfan 's message, "Kyrie Sutton" on Sunday, May 04, 09:39:04pm

Mention of SPC came from a Sept 2007 referance. SPC was not even mentioned in a late April report from the same network. He is mentioned as qualified, but I am not sure about that or he would have already been signed by one of the upper schools. The only true connection we have is that one of his teammates is coming our way.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> On the other hand -- E++, Monday, May 05, 11:49:44am [1]

He just appeared on the SPC list from CAA insider. Those guys seem to keep pretty much up-to-date, although they still have Conley committed to SPC.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: On the other hand -- Peacock, Monday, May 05, 12:05:58pm [1]

These guys do scour the boards, but missed the Sept 07 article. It does show up when you Google him. While I want to hope, I think it is more improbabe because of qualification/ other school interests. CAA is a great site, but much like many of the recruiting sources, have its flaws. I know of contradicitons on Sutton's qualifications. And remeber CAA is one step removed from these flawed sources.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> You're right of course -- E++, Monday, May 05, 12:15:17pm [1]

but the thought that John might get this player will give me more hope for the program than I've had in a long time....until he goes elsewhere...


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Not to Disappoint -- Sludge, Wednesday, May 07, 11:22:36am [1]

Not sure my blackberry is enabled for site. Anyway, forget Sutton or Providence visit; hope is that we will see contribution from new 6'8" big out of the South. We should hear more detail soon.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Not to Disappoint -- Peacock, Wednesday, May 07, 12:29:54pm [1]

I agree on Sutton. Never though he was even in the mix. You do know about LP, but qualification may have caused Dunne to bypass.


[ Edit | View ]



[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.