Re: Your Wrong -- Referees, Rules and Laws

Hermosa Beach Florist, Expressive Flowers has been Serving flowers nationwide since 1995.

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject: Re: Your Wrong

Author:
Bryce
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 22:35:16 03/07/02 Thu
Author Host/IP: proxy01.syd.iprimus.net.au/210.50.30.6
In reply to: keg 's message, "Re: Your Wrong" on 20:34:56 03/04/02 Mon

Keg, I think NT is right. The 'advancement' is a penalty in itself. It is a penalty for abusing the ref.

Abusing a ref is nothing to do with a scrum, even is someone pokes their head out and abuses the ref!

>But i'm not giving a differential for misconduct,I am
>advancing the scrum penalty because of misconduct-the
>misconduct adds 10 metres but it is still the scrum
>penalty
>
>>Where in the rule book is that Keg?
>>
>>You cannot award a differential for misconduct. When
>>you advance the mark, what ineffect you do, is
>>continue the infringement a further 10 metres cause it
>>is on-going. How is a scrum penalty ongoing? It cant
>>be.
>>
>>This is a crucial call - imagine 10 secs to go, 12-all
>>and you do that,.......

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

Re: Your Wrong keg 15:43:28 03/08/02 Fri

THE ANSWER -- ANSWER, 01:22:14 03/09/02 Sat

Re: THE ANSWER -- keg, 16:58:23 03/10/02 Sun

Re: THE ANSWER -- NTRef, 14:58:21 03/11/02 Mon

[ VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Keg, I think NT is right. The 'advancement' is a >penalty in itself. It is a penalty for abusing the ref. > >Abusing a ref is nothing to do with a scrum, even is >someone pokes their head out and abuses the ref! > >>But i'm not giving a differential for misconduct,I am >>advancing the scrum penalty because of misconduct-the >>misconduct adds 10 metres but it is still the scrum >>penalty >> >>>Where in the rule book is that Keg? >>> >>>You cannot award a differential for misconduct. When >>>you advance the mark, what ineffect you do, is >>>continue the infringement a further 10 metres cause >it >>>is on-going. How is a scrum penalty ongoing? It cant >>>be. >>> >>>This is a crucial call - imagine 10 secs to go, >12-all >>>and you do that,.......
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+10
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.