You can be penalised through territorial loss as well,but it all comes back to what is the original penalty for?It was for a scrum breach,and that is that
>Keg, I think NT is right. The 'advancement' is a
>penalty in itself. It is a penalty for abusing the ref.
>
>Abusing a ref is nothing to do with a scrum, even is
>someone pokes their head out and abuses the ref!
>
>>But i'm not giving a differential for misconduct,I am
>>advancing the scrum penalty because of misconduct-the
>>misconduct adds 10 metres but it is still the scrum
>>penalty
>>
>>>Where in the rule book is that Keg?
>>>
>>>You cannot award a differential for misconduct. When
>>>you advance the mark, what ineffect you do, is
>>>continue the infringement a further 10 metres cause
>it
>>>is on-going. How is a scrum penalty ongoing? It cant
>>>be.
>>>
>>>This is a crucial call - imagine 10 secs to go,
>12-all
>>>and you do that,.......
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]