VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8]910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:21:53 08/26/02 Mon
Author: mystikal_jaleigh
Subject: Re: Ian kissing Aras DOESN'T mean he did IT w/ her!
In reply to: Lark 's message, "Re: Ian kissing Aras DOESN'T mean he did IT w/ her!" on 10:47:54 08/26/02 Mon

>>>Hey everyone and I would like to say thanks to the
>>>ones that replied to my message "Answer this for me
>>>pLz" Thanks! :)
>>>Now, on to the new message: I don't think that Ian
>>>kissing Aras could have lead to the "wild thing".
>>>Because 1.) a kiss is just a kiss.
>
>And a sigh is just a sigh.
>
>The fundamental things in life as time goes by.
>
>>>2) he may have had other motives behind it, like
>>>distracting Aras from leaving to harm Sara like she
>>>wanted to.
>
>Very possible. But in distracting the she-goat, you
>have to consider her predatory nature, she probably
>knew he was trying to distract her, so if he did NOT
>go "all the way", she'd have probably gone after Sara
>as a means to punish Ian!
>
>Of course, she still went after Sara effectively, by
>kidnapping Conchobar. Perhaps she WAS punishing him
>for holding back.

:) I agree with you totally, but why protect her than at the end instead of Sara??????????
>
>>>3) Irons said to him "Virginity is invulnerability!"
>>>and he said in the opening episode when Iron's
>plotted
>>>to kill Sara with Christine's help. "You've taught me
>>>since I was a child to protect the weilder...Iron's
>>>also taught him that his virginity is his
>>>invulnerabilty, since he was a child. so why would he
>>>give up the things he's known since birth????
>
>How come you aren't a virgin? Or me? Or anyone? I
>don't care if I knew it since birth, I happen to LIKE
>Doing The Nasty!

>It's my opinion, so don't hate me that he was taught to keep his virginity like he was taught to protect the witchblade and the weilder, you don't give up your beliefs just like that. True people like to experiment and try new things and he is more independant...so it's a possibility. :)
>He
>>>didn't give up protecting Sara as of yet because he
>>>has never really tried to killed her, for at the end
>>>he was always protecting her. So Ian could just be
>>>protecting her.....
>
>He's exploring his independence. Sometimes sex is
>exploration.

I agree, but sex is to be given to the one you love and shouldn't be taken lightly and that is what Ian was taught that things should never be taken lightly. :) But he is becoming more of a free man in this season.
>
>>>4.) His protection, lessons, and loyalty to Sara he
>>>learned since childhood.
>>>5.) Last, but most important I think, is this:(my
>>>boyfriend pointed it out) In every episode from
>season
>>>one and two they have showed almost in great detail,
>>>Sara making love with Crunchy and her other lover,
>and
>>>Iron's with Christine on the table. They have Sara
>>>and her men, and Iron's and his fling was showed that
>>>they did become lovers or had sex.... So, in Ian's
>>>situation they didn't show that! With Ian and Aras,
>>>only the kiss was shown and like my hubby said, "when
>>>the cast on witchblade kiss that's all they show,
>>>UNLESS it leads through all the bases! Then they show
>>>whoever cast member doing the "wild thing" with
>>>whoever! The writers showed it with Iron's and
>>>Christine, Sara and Crunchy,and also her lover that
>>>was immortal..... All in all my b/f and I don't think
>>>Ian lost his virginity.
>
>'tis true. 'tis very true. Well, except with Gabe, who
>we really just had a referral to his sex-life when his
>girlfriend came out clad only in his shirt. Or Danny,
>but then I guess we have to deal with the reality that
>he is married and therefore sex in his life isn't
>exciting enough for prime-time. ("Lock and Load!")
>
>>>It is just some thoughts, but my boyfriend's thought
>
>So, now, (and this is WAAAYYYY Off Topic) you have me
>confused. Do you have a hubby? Or a boyfriend? Or both?

I have a b/f, he just likes me to call him Hubby or bubby, it's nicknames he has. :)
>
>>>(5.) really makes sense....I think so anyway. Add all
>>>those up and Ian giving up his virginity doesn't seem
>>>to add up.
>>>I am also hoping.
>
>Hoping for...???

Sorry I ramble and space out I am hoping he didn't, but if he did maybe he'll learn something from it. :)
>
>>>I would love to hear your thoughts and opinions too.
>>:)
>>>M.J.
>>
>
>Well... as Devil's Advocate, here's hoping he *didn't*
>do it with her. I mean, she's just... yick. Even
>someone as ingenuous as Ian should be aware that sex
>with a she-goat takes the purity of the first time out
>of it. And I don't think Ian is shallow enough to want
>to just waste it like that. I mean, it would be like
>going to Times Square with $20.
>
Great theory and I like what you had to say about Ian and $20 bucks...with all the money he has I'm sure he'd fork out more than that...but still. Good theory. :)
>>
>>I think he did. I posted this in another thread, but
>>I'll post it here too. Here's why I think so:
>>
>>The phallic symbolism of the scimitar being thrust
>>into the candle and the "finis" on the screen behind
>>them as The Son of The Shiek ends (signifying an "end"
>>to his virginity).
>
>Well, much as I wish otherwise, I happen to agree with
>Beck, here.
>
>>Either way, we've been told to expect the answer to
>>the question of Nottingham's virginity in tonight's
>>finale.
>>
>>Beck
>
I know I noticed that to, and I was upset, but than my b/f pointed out the things I wrote in this message.

>Or not. Because of course, nothing is final. HEY!
>Maybe Ian doing it with Aras was just a DREAM!!
>
True! True! (crosses fingers) :) m.j
>:o)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.