Friday, May 2, 2008 - New servers are in! Click-in for more info!
VoyForums

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:01:08 05/01/08 Thu
Author: Cy
Subject: Re: Dutch at Lowestoft 1665
In reply to: Albert Parker 's message, "Re: Dutch at Lowestoft 1665" on 10:05:18 05/01/08 Thu

Mr Parker

your assistance would be greatly appreciated. I have been after a copy of Foxs's book for a while, but have yet to find one. I do have a copy of Penn, so that will get another look.

If you could email a copy of the list to CyjayneATtiscali.co.uk I would be most greatful. I have been trying to split the ships into the seven squadrons without too much success so maybe this list will help.

My latest take on the fleets can be seen at
http://3decks.pbwiki.com/Battle%20of%20Lowestoft

Thanks

Cy

>The authoritative source for this is probably Frank L.
>Fox, A Distant Storm: The Four Days' Battle of
>1666: The Greatest Sea Fight of the Age of Sail

>(Rotherfield, England: Press of Sail Publications,
>1996), 365-67. This book actually covers the entire
>Second Anglo-Dutch War (1665-67). Fox says the
>following in his headnote to his Appendix C:
>
>"The list of the Dutch fleet at Loestoft is drawn
>mainly from [Cornelis] de Jonge, Geschiedenis van
>het Nederlandsche Zeewezen
. Some details are from
>a list in [William] Penn, Memorials of Sir William
>Penn,
and two lists from English intelligence
>sources in [the Earl of] Sandwich's journal. De Jonge
>gives the fleet as it stood at its departure from the
>Texel on 13-14 May. The only known adjustments
>thereafter were the addition of the late-arriving
>Zwanenburg and Visscher, and the
>deletion of the 30-gun Noorderkwartier frigate
>Kasteel van Medemblik which was sent home due
>to weather damage.
>
>"The Dutch had not yet adopted the line-ahead, so the
>ships had no assigned stations. The squadrons are
>listed not in order of fighting, but in order of
>precedence. Within each squadron, the commanders of
>the first three ships served as admiral, vice-admiral,
>and rear-admiral."
>
>Fox included for each ship its admiralty, number of
>guns, number of men, and captain.
>
>As Cy notes, this is a long list. I am suprised that
>it is not available electronically on Jim Bender's
>"Kentish Knock" site. If Cy is the only one what
>wants it, and he can't get access to Fox, I would
>photocopy it and mail it to him.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:


Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.