Author:
teltalheart/moderator
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 23:40:00 07/25/10 Sun
Author Host/IP: NoHost/67.72.98.58 In reply to:
teltalheart/moderator
's message, "Post 246 A: What Happened to America?, Part II." on 21:10:53 06/13/10 Sun
>Post 246 A: What Happened to America?, Part II.
>
>As most of you know Pres. Nixon opened up China to the
>west in the early 1970's. Did you ever wonder why he
>did that?
> There's this story, I won't call it a lie just yet,
>about China's Premire Dung Chow Ping (Deng Xiaoping)
>and 18 farmers. The story goes, these farmers formed
>and illegal farm co-operative to make extra money and
>grow more food for their own families. The farmers
>were founded out. But, Dung Chow Ping not only didn't
>punish them but let them keep going as they had been
>and encouraged other farmers to do likewise. This was
>in, I think, 1978.
> Starting about 1992 jobs and companies started going
>to China. The pace increased in about 1999.
>
>But why? Why was all this happening? Oh sure, the
>Chinese work for a dollar a day. Where the Mexicans
>wanted three dollars a day, (a mere survival wage).
>The companies would also escape U.S. pollution laws.
>
>No one ever seems to talk about the real reason.
>It seems Dung Chow Ping had let it be known to the
>west (U.S.A.) that he was going to start selling
>nuclear technology to anyone, third world nutcase or
>terrorist organization, that wanted it.
>
>It seems the very rich, this includes politicians,
>couldn't bare the thought of their very wealthy, very
>plush life style ending in a mushroom cloud.
>
>The very rich also knew there would be advantages to
>closing down factories in the U.S. and parts of Europe
>and moving them to China, as I have stated above.
>
>The U.S.A. signed so many agreement with China, at the
>behest of the WTO, that I wonder if the U.S.A. didn't
>end as a sovereign nation in 1992, or at least 1999?
>Is it now just a satellite state of China?
>
>One could say China, Dung Chow Ping, threated the west
>in an around-about way.
>No agreement made under the threat of violence is
>legal. It seem to me we, the west, could get out of
>this agreement, and out debt, easily.
>But, that's not likely happen. there are just too many
>people making a lot of money on this.
>
>The only thing the very rich had to do to make a ton
>of money was to throw the working middle class under
>the bus.
>
>Unfortunately there is no political party that
>represents the majority of working Americans. The rich
>are represented by the Republicans. The minorities are
>represented by the Democrats. There is nobody to
>represent the working middle class white guy that
>makes up the majority of the workers in the U.S.A.,
>it's just a fact.
>
>But it's odd, isn't it! The rich couldn't or wouldn't
>standup to the Chinese. Yet here we are in Iraq and
>Afghanistan defending their "liberties." So, when we
>do pull out, if we ever do, they can go right back to
>killing each other and blaming us, as in U.S..
>
>See you next time.
>End post 246 A: teltalheart www.voy.com/40560/
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
|