Author:
teltalheart/moderator
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 01:46:55 08/02/14 Sat
Author Host/IP: 98-159-196-245.scottsboro.org/98.159.196.245
Post 343 A: Grand Archduke of Doggerland
Along with the title Grand Royal Sovereign Prince of Doggerland.
I am claiming the title of Grand Archduke of Doggerland. I claim it as a bloodline descendant of the former inhabitants of the area now known as Doggerland, as I am Y-DNA R1b1a2a1a1a, and under the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (1995).
Many years ago I tried to register that title on a blog that was posted as a micro-nation registry. The guy running the site said he was no longer accepting new micro-nations, but he liked my idea. Some months later I saw the title I was claiming for myself as head of my micro-nation being used by somebody else on the net. I just figured someone had stolen my idea. I've seen nothing as of yet to change that opinion.
So what makes me different then that guy? I'm a bloodline descendant of the inhabitants of Doggerland. I've claimed the title legally under the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (1995). I'm a descendant of Noble and Royal blood from many lines. If you think it's a case of the pot calling the kettle black, it isn't. If he were questioning my right as compared his. It would be a case of the pot calling the silver tea service black. I'm not black. I may be a little dingy and in need of some polish. But that's just because I wasn't lucky enough, and it is just luck, to be born on the side of the family with money. I'm still a descendant of Royal and Noble blood and still a DIRECT descendant of those long ago inhabitants of Doggerland. I don't see how I can get much more deserving of ownership of the titles than that!
I sent out letters of my proclamation to all the countries surrounding Doggerland. I noticed a little over a month later some of the places on the internet where my work had been quoted by others, had disappeared. Now that's odd! I claimed the title to Doggerland as sovereign under and as an incorporeal hereditament, (title without land attached). So as anyone can plainly see I'm not claiming real estate property that might be claimed by someone else. Why would I; Doggerland is at least fifty feet under the North Sea.
But imagine hubris of other countries surrounding Doggerland. Germany, France, The Netherlands, England having the hubris to be envious or ill tempered over the fact that their Royaltys didn't get to claim Doggerland. These countries who's Nobles and Royal have taken so much money from the pockets of their own people to feather their personal beds, so to speak, and live a life style you and I can only dream about. But if one goes to 'Heraldica.org French heraldry' one finds that there never was a requirement that one needed a certain amount of wealth to be considered to be Noble, or Royal. It's just something in the minds of these people, like the corporate executives of today, that they had to have more than everybody else. And for them to have more, everybody else had to accept less. Less money, less education, less health care, less benefits, less of a life then those who have made a life style out of being consider privileged. And it is only a consideration common people have come to accept as fact.
Did you know; It's an interesting fact that William the 'Conqueror' was William 'The Bastard?' William was the son of Robert "The Devil" Duke of Normandy and the daughter of a common tanner. Thus it was a "morganatic" coupling between a member of a royal or noble family and a person of inferior rank in which the rank of the inferior partner remains unchanged and the children of the marriage/coupling do not succeed to the titles and or fiefs. Thus the entire British Nobility, descending and taking their rank from William, can be considered as illegitimate.
The British Monarchy is, however, an observable reality. Some might consider my legitimacy to be the same as that of William. Thus if the British Monarchy is illegitimate then so would mine be. But the British Monarchy exists. It is also an observable reality that I am a direct bloodline descendant of the Doggerland people and thereby heir of the Doggerland Chieftains/Royalty. It is also an observable reality that I have claimed the titles Grand Royal Sovereign Prince of Doggerland and Grand Archduke of Doggerland under the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (1995). It Is also an observable reality by genealogical evidence that I am a descendant of Noble and Royal blood.
In reality power behind titles, in Europe, ended in 1918 after WWI. All European titles are now pretty-much nominal and honorary. It's now getting close to that one hundred year mark when titles became costume jewelry.
I am in reality just an average guy without a grand castle. But, I am not dirt under anyone's feet!
Imagine that! Average Joe makes good.
End Post 343 A: teltalheart is Sir Michael D. Barnes, Grand Royal Sovereign Prince and Grand Archduke of Doggerland.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
|
Feedback: 
Post 343 A: Grand Archduke of Doggerland